207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3650662)
1. Limitations within the cervical cytology screening service.
Carr P
Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1987 Jun; 23(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 3650662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical screening. Testing times.
Dignan K
Nurs Times; 1993 Nov 3-9; 89(44):28-30. PubMed ID: 8233961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cytology screening.
Sherwood A
BMJ; 1988 Sep; 297(6648):625. PubMed ID: 3139256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical screening.
Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (378):8. PubMed ID: 6569356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical screening.
Cuzick J
Br J Hosp Med; 1988 Apr; 39(4):265. PubMed ID: 3390638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
Chamberlain J
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An economic appraisal of a mobile cervical cytology screening service.
Bloch B
S Afr Med J; 1997 Feb; 87(2):231. PubMed ID: 9180819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The cervical screening muddle.
Sutton G
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer screening--an alternative viewpoint.
Rogers A
West Engl Med J; 1990 Sep; 105(3):77-9, 71. PubMed ID: 2093353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New tests in cervical screening.
Raffle AE
Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9098):297. PubMed ID: 9457130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Sasieni P
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical screening in general practice.
BMJ; 1990 Jul; 301(6745):236-8. PubMed ID: 2393733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter: Cervical cytology screening.
Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Apr; 110(8):890 passim. PubMed ID: 4824962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of cervical cytology.
Lancet; 1972 Dec; 2(7789):1236-7. PubMed ID: 4117718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The cervical screening muddle.
Herbert A
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129-30. PubMed ID: 9660603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure of the cervical cytology screening programme.
Robin ED
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6461):75-7. PubMed ID: 3917346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The cervical screening muddle.
Womack C; Warren AY
Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1129. PubMed ID: 9660601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [A final reply on cervix cancer screening: nobody is disputing its effects, but... ].
Bistoletti P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov; 97(47):5519-20. PubMed ID: 11192779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
Pflanz M
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
