168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36507705)
1. Comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in lymph node metastasis/dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer.
Li Z; Gai C; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Huang C; Zhao B; Tian Z
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Oct; 135(20):2446-2452. PubMed ID: 36507705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph node dissection in esophageal carcinoma: Minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open surgery.
Ye B; Zhong CX; Yang Y; Fang WT; Mao T; Ji CY; Li ZG
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 22(19):4750-6. PubMed ID: 27217706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of right upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after tri-incisional esophagectomies.
Hsu PK; Huang CS; Hsieh CC; Wu YC; Hsu WH
Surgery; 2014 Nov; 156(5):1269-77. PubMed ID: 24953277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Characteristics and risk factors of lymph node metastasis in pN1 stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Ma Z; Chen C; Duan X; Liu X; Gong L; Yu Z
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 53(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 26359074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Regulations and lymphadenectomy strategy of mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].
Xue HC; Wu CR; Zhang ZB; Zhu ZH; Ma ZK; Gao J
Ai Zheng; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1020-4. PubMed ID: 17927865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.
Chen J; Wu S; Zheng X; Pan J; Zhu K; Chen Y; Li J; Liao L; Lin Y; Liao Z
BMC Surg; 2014 Dec; 14():110. PubMed ID: 25527100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0.
Darwish MB; Nagatomo K; Jackson T; Cho E; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33414613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
