135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36507881)
1. Effectiveness of quantitative bone SPECT/CT for bone metastasis diagnosis.
Ikeda T; Kitajima K; Tsuchitani T; Takahashi Y; Hama Y; Kotura N
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 36507881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography in differential diagnosis of bone metastases.
Zhang Y; Li B; Yu H; Song J; Zhou Y; Shi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jan; 42(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 33044406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases.
Tabotta F; Jreige M; Schaefer N; Becce F; Prior JO; Nicod Lalonde M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):619. PubMed ID: 31878904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative SPECT/CT as an osteoblastic biomarker for the discrimination of active bone metastasis in prostate cancer.
Kuji I; Yamane T; Seto A; Yasumizu Y; Shirotake S; Oyama M
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2017; 1(1):2. PubMed ID: 29782587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum standardized uptake value from quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating metastatic and degenerative joint disease of the spine in prostate cancer patients.
Mohd Rohani MF; Mat Nawi N; Shamim SE; Wan Sohaimi WF; Wan Zainon WMN; Musarudin M; Said MA; Hashim H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 34(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 31612417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized uptake values of
Qi N; Meng Q; You Z; Chen H; Shou Y; Zhao J
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):39. PubMed ID: 33639883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification evaluation of
Huang K; Feng Y; Liu D; Liang W; Li L
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31768820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bone metastasis burden as an imaging biomarker by quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for assessing prostate cancer with bone metastasis: a phantom and clinical study.
Motegi K; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T; Koizumi M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Sep; 13(3):219-229. PubMed ID: 32535819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained using quantitative SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Lin L; Zheng R; Geng J; Wang X; Li M; Fan R; Zheng Y; Yang K
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1119214. PubMed ID: 36817798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT applications for cartilaginous bone neoplasms.
Kitajima K; Futani H; Tsuchitani T; Takahashi Y; Tachibana T; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 32716404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hybrid
Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints.
An YS; Park DY; Min BH; Lee SJ; Yoon JK
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33771130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardized Uptake Value from Semiquantitative Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebrae of Breast Cancer Patients.
Rohani MFM; Yonan SNM; Tagiling N; Zainon WMNW; Udin Y; Nawi NM
Asian Spine J; 2020 Oct; 14(5):629-638. PubMed ID: 32213791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical value of the threshold derived from bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating sternoclavicular arthritis.
Tsuchitani T; Kitajima K; Azuma N; Tamura M; Takahashi Y; Kotoura N
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 35388802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients.
Umeda T; Koizumi M; Fukai S; Miyaji N; Motegi K; Nakazawa S; Takiguchi T
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Feb; 32(2):105-113. PubMed ID: 29243019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest repeatability of quantitative bone SPECT/CT.
Yamane T; Fukushima K; Shirotake S; Nishimoto K; Okabe T; Oyama M; Seto A; Kuji I
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 35(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 33400148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-head comparison of
Zhang Y; Lin Z; Li T; Wei Y; Yu M; Ye L; Cai Y; Yang S; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15993. PubMed ID: 36163353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximum standardized uptake value of foot SPECT/CT using Tc-99m HDP in patients with accessory navicular bone as a predictor of surgical treatment.
Bae S; Kang Y; Song YS; Lee WW;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(2):e14022. PubMed ID: 30633193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective study of SPECT/CT scans using SUV measurement of the normal pelvis with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate.
Wang R; Duan X; Shen C; Han D; Ma J; Wu H; Xu X; Qin T; Fan Q; Zhang Z; Shi W; Guo Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 30103368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
