These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36508850)

  • 1. Rate of upper incisor retraction in Class II division 1 patients managed with palatal versus buccal miniscrew supported segmental orthodontics: Randomized parallel clinical trial.
    Zaher GR; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
    Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100710. PubMed ID: 36508850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after total maxillary arch distalization using the casted palatal plate vs. buccal miniscrews: A randomized clinical trial.
    Raghis TR; Alsulaiman TMA; Mahmoud G; Youssef M
    Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100808. PubMed ID: 37647676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
    Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined use of miniscrews and continuous arch for intrusive root movement of incisors in Class II division 2 with gummy smile.
    Kim SJ; Kim JW; Choi TH; Lee KJ
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 24512532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial.
    Abdelhady NA; Tawfik MA; Hammad SM
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31974060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of treatment effects of total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plate vs buccal miniscrews.
    Lee SK; Abbas NH; Bayome M; Baik UB; Kook YA; Hong M; Park JH
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
    Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.
    Deguchi T; Murakami T; Kuroda S; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 18456138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lingual orthodontics in an adult patient with upper premolar extraction: Case report.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Kaitsas F
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):165-177. PubMed ID: 31495754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective comparison of two different miniscrew-supported molar distalization methods applied in the buccal and palatal regions.
    Aslan YS; Yavan MA; Hamamci N
    J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):145-152. PubMed ID: 38522972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two treatment protocols for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants : A prospective clinical trial.
    Felicita AS; Khader SA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jan; 85(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 35482028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews.
    Liou EJ; Chang PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.