These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36509434)

  • 21. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Critical Factors for Binaural Hearing in Children with Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: First Implant Performance and Inter-Implant Interval.
    Jang JH; Roh JM; Choo OS; Kim YJ; Kim H; Park HY; Choung YH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):174-182. PubMed ID: 31394542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In Vivo Electrocochleography in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users Implicates TMPRSS3 in Spiral Ganglion Function.
    Shearer AE; Tejani VD; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Smith RJH
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14165. PubMed ID: 30242206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral project: Demographics and results of localization and speech perception testing.
    Cullington HE; Bele D; Brinton JC; Cooper S; Daft M; Harding J; Hatton N; Humphries J; Lutman ME; Maddocks J; Maggs J; Millward K; O'Donoghue G; Patel S; Rajput K; Salmon V; Sear T; Speers A; Wheeler A; Wilson K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2-22. PubMed ID: 28010679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sequential pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation: The effect of time interval between implants.
    Bianchin G; Tribi L; Formigoni P; Russo C; Polizzi V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():10-14. PubMed ID: 29106853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Yamamoto R; Naito Y; Tona R; Moroto S; Tamaya R; Fujiwara K; Shinohara S; Takebayashi S; Kikuchi M; Michida T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():160-168. PubMed ID: 29106867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Age at Implantation on Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Short Durations of Single-Sided Deafness.
    Gordon KA; Alemu R; Papsin BC; Negandhi J; Cushing SL
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Mar; 44(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 36728258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents.
    Almeida GFL; Martins MF; Costa LBAD; Costa OAD; Martinho de Carvalho AC
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 30166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients.
    Gifford RH; Driscoll CL; Davis TJ; Fiebig P; Micco A; Dorman MF
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 26164443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates.
    Park LR; Perkins EL; Woodard JS; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 33352551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Perreau A; Gantz B; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 20085199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.