153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36509642)
1. Repeatability and correlation of corneal biomechanical measurements obtained by Corvis ST in orthokeratology patients.
Lu W; Ding W; Ji R; Tian Y; Zhao C; Li H; Jiao M; Guo Z; Leng L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Jun; 46(3):101793. PubMed ID: 36509642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical assessment of healthy and keratoconic corneas (with/without crosslinking) using dynamic ultrahigh-speed Scheimpflug technology and the relevance of the parameter (A1L-A2L).
Fuchsluger TA; Brettl S; Geerling G; Kaisers W; Franko Zeitz P
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 29871966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of changes in corneal biomechanics after orthokeratology using Corvis ST.
Zhang P; Wu J; Jiang J; Zhang X; Ran Z; Jiang F; Zheng X; Wang J; Elsheikh A; Bao F
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2024 Feb; 47(1):102100. PubMed ID: 38072740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia.
Wang X; McAlinden C; Zhang H; Yan J; Wang D; Wei W; Mi S
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3041. PubMed ID: 33542296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Li Y; Tian L; Guo LL; Hao Y; Jie Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():863240. PubMed ID: 35497328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal deformation response parameters of dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
Herber R; Vinciguerra R; Lopes B; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 32050237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST.
Wang W; He M; He H; Zhang C; Jin H; Zhong X
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 27964894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].
Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P
Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanical parameters in systemic autoimmune diseases.
Ozarslan Ozcan D; Ozcan SC; Kimyon G
Clin Exp Optom; 2022 Jan; 105(1):61-64. PubMed ID: 33719873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Indentation Assessment to Measure Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Xu Y; Ye Y; Chong IT; Chen Z; Xu J; Yang Y; Yu K; Lam DCC; Yu M
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 10(9):36. PubMed ID: 34459861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of congenital blepharoptosis on corneal biomechanical properties and changes after ptosis surgery.
Li X; Liu C; Mao Z; Liang X; Li Z; Liu X; Gong R; Huang D
Eye (Lond); 2020 Jun; 34(6):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 31558826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlations among Corneal Biomechanical Parameters, Stiffness, and Thickness Measured Using Corvis ST and Pentacam in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
Liu Q; Pang C; Liu C; Cheng W; Ming S; Du W; Feng X
J Ophthalmol; 2022; 2022():7387581. PubMed ID: 36510627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of corneal biomechanics in anisometropia using Scheimpflug technology.
Gao R; Ren Y; Li S; Xu H; Lin X; McAlinden C; Ye J; Huang J; Yu J
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():994353. PubMed ID: 36338123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes.
Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Zhao D; Ren S
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15379. PubMed ID: 31653884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal biomechanical parameters derived from Corvis ST.
Serbecic N; Beutelspacher S; Markovic L; Roy AS; Shetty R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 31744320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Keratoconus diagnosis using Corvis ST measured biomechanical parameters.
Elham R; Jafarzadehpur E; Hashemi H; Amanzadeh K; Shokrollahzadeh F; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
J Curr Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 29(3):175-181. PubMed ID: 28913507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Biomechanical Changes in Myopia Patients with Unsatisfactory Corneas After Femto Second-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) Concurrent with Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Using Corvis-ST: Two-Year Follow-Up Results.
Xu W; Tao Y; Wang L; Huang Y
Med Sci Monit; 2017 Jul; 23():3649-3656. PubMed ID: 28747621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The association between corneal biomechanical parameters and visual field progression in patients with normal tension glaucoma].
Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Fang Y; Tian T; Yan XM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 54(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 29518874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
