118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36509688)
1. Reasons that clinicians in Australia offer cervical screening outside guidelines for frequency, age and co-testing.
Dodd RH; Obermair HM; McCaffery KJ
Public Health Res Pract; 2022 Dec; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 36509688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinicians' attitude towards changes in Australian National Cervical Screening Program.
Yap D; Liang X; Garland SM; Hartley S; Gorelik A; Ogilvie G; Tan J; Wrede CDH; Jayasinghe Y
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S81-S87. PubMed ID: 26651602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Australian National Cervical Screening Program renewal: Attitudes and experiences of general practitioners, and obstetricians and gynaecologists.
Obermair HM; Bennett KF; Brotherton JML; Smith MA; McCaffery KJ; Dodd RH
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jun; 61(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 33512715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary HPV DNA based cervical cancer screening at 25 years: Views of young Australian women aged 16-28 years.
Jayasinghe Y; Rangiah C; Gorelik A; Ogilvie G; Wark JD; Hartley S; Garland SM
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S74-S80. PubMed ID: 26589584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do they cope or mope? A survey of GPs' experiences with the changes in the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.
Afseth S; Bowe A; Mjølstad BP; Vie GÅ; Baasland I
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2022 Sep; 40(3):385-394. PubMed ID: 36314584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporation of human papillomavirus self-sampling into the revised National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative study of GP experiences and attitudes in rural New South Wales.
Foo YM; Goswami P; Grogin J; Hargan E; Thangarajah M; Dutton T; Mendel S; Bailey J
Aust J Prim Health; 2021 Aug; 27(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 33985644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.
Rijkaart DC; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Bulkmans NW; Heideman DA; Kenter GG; Cuzick J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 22177579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Self-Sampling as an Alternative Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Population Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wong EL; Cheung AW; Wong AY; Chan PK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32867315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.
Evans D; Goldstein S; Loewy A; Altman AD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Aug; 41(8):1221-1234. PubMed ID: 31331610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine cervical screening by primary HPV testing: early findings in the renewed National Cervical Screening Program.
Machalek DA; Roberts JM; Garland SM; Thurloe J; Richards A; Chambers I; Sivertsen T; Farnsworth A
Med J Aust; 2019 Aug; 211(3):113-119. PubMed ID: 31168828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study.
Gök M; Heideman DA; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; Spruyt JW; Voorhorst F; Beliën JA; Babovic M; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1040. PubMed ID: 20223872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Moyer VA;
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 156(12):880-91, W312. PubMed ID: 22711081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.
Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Arbyn M; Ogilvie G; Minozzi S; Banzi R; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2223-36. PubMed ID: 22907569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Challenges in cervical cancer prevention: a survey of U.S. obstetrician-gynecologists.
Perkins RB; Anderson BL; Gorin SS; Schulkin JA
Am J Prev Med; 2013 Aug; 45(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 23867024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
