These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36510464)

  • 1. Discussion on the selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis.
    Fang Q; Wu J
    Ann Palliat Med; 2022 Dec; 11(12):3842-3843. PubMed ID: 36510464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction of subtype-specific prognostic gene signatures for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer using meta feature selection methods.
    Liu C; Wang L; Wang T; Tian S
    Oncol Lett; 2019 Sep; 18(3):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 31402939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using information-theoretic approaches for model selection in meta-analysis.
    Cinar O; Umbanhowar J; Hoeksema JD; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):537-556. PubMed ID: 33932323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discussion on the interpretation of the results and selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis.
    Tu J; Fang Q; Zhao A; Wu J
    Ann Palliat Med; 2022 Mar; 11(3):1153-1154. PubMed ID: 35272465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discussion on the selection of effect size in meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Wang X; Xie F
    Ann Palliat Med; 2022 Feb; 11(2):969-970. PubMed ID: 35184566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis based variable selection for gene expression data.
    Li Q; Wang S; Huang CC; Yu M; Shao J
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 25196635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Komukai S; Friede T; Hattori S
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):658-673. PubMed ID: 34169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.
    Borenstein M; Hedges LV; Higgins JP; Rothstein HR
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Apr; 1(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 26061376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-Analyzing Multiple Omics Data With Robust Variable Selection.
    Hu Z; Zhou Y; Tong T
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():656826. PubMed ID: 34290735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing methods for estimating patient-specific treatment effects in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Seo M; White IR; Furukawa TA; Imai H; Valgimigli M; Egger M; Zwahlen M; Efthimiou O
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(6):1553-1573. PubMed ID: 33368415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altruism and the hypothesis of meta-selection in human evolution.
    Knobloch F
    J Am Acad Psychoanal; 2001; 29(2):339-54. PubMed ID: 11685996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias.
    Chootrakool H; Shi JQ; Yue R
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1183-98. PubMed ID: 21538449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Green SE; Forbes AB
    Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2():21. PubMed ID: 23575367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Sutton A; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 22806991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.