These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36511072)

  • 1. Surface roughness and marginal adaptation of stereolithography versus digital light processing three-dimensional printed resins: An
    Wadhwani V; Sivaswamy V; Rajaraman V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):377-381. PubMed ID: 36511072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques.
    Ellakany P; Fouda SM; AlGhamdi MA; Aly NM
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104458. PubMed ID: 36806621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal fit of milled versus different 3D-printed materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses: an
    Igreţ A; Rotar RN; Ille C; Topală F; Jivănescu A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2023 Jul; 96(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 37577020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal and Internal Gaps, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Provisional Crowns Fabricated With 3D Printing and Milling Systems.
    Al-Wahadni A; Abu Rashed BO; Al-Fodeh R; Tabanjah A; Hatamleh M
    Oper Dent; 2023 Jul; 48(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 37352464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
    Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology.
    Alharbi N; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 27611757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of build orientation on adaptation of casting patterns for three-unit partial fixed dental prostheses fabricated by using digital light projection.
    Chaiamornsup P; Iwasaki N; Tsuchida Y; Takahashi H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 33648796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study.
    You SG; You SM; Kang SY; Bae SY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):479-485. PubMed ID: 32276824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
    Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
    Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Additively Manufactured and Milled Interim 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses.
    Karasan D; Legaz J; Boitelle P; Mojon P; Fehmer V; Sailer I
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):58-69. PubMed ID: 34792821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies.
    Yoo SY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim JG
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33809970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
    Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of ceramic crowns fabricated with the stereolithography technique.
    Wang W; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):657-663. PubMed ID: 32418664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
    Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.