These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36512162)
21. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploring training dental implant placement using static or dynamic devices among dental students. Wang W; Zhuang M; Li S; Shen Y; Lan R; Wu Y; Wang F Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 Aug; 27(3):438-448. PubMed ID: 35579548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy in Healed and Fresh Extraction Sockets between Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Navigation Systems: A Model-Based Evaluation. Wang M; Rausch-Fan X; Zhan Y; Shen H; Liu F Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 35454496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted systems: an in vitro study. Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Zhu YB; Geng YM J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):343-348. PubMed ID: 33307210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study. Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An alternative method for immediate implant-supported restoration of anterior teeth assisted by fully guided templates: A clinical study. Zhang X; Wang M; Mo A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):636-645. PubMed ID: 33008632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review. Pimkhaokham A; Jiaranuchart S; Kaboosaya B; Arunjaroensuk S; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N Periodontol 2000; 2022 Oct; 90(1):197-223. PubMed ID: 35924457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study. Takács A; Marada G; Turzó K; Nagy Á; Németh O; Mijiritsky E; Kivovics M; Mühl A BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):575. PubMed ID: 37596610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial. Chandran K R S; Goyal M; Mittal N; George JS J Dent; 2023 Sep; 136():104620. PubMed ID: 37454788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. Smitkarn P; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery With Different Fields of View of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Lee HC; Chiou LL; Yang CC; Lin WS; Dutra V; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr; 50(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 38400736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study. Chen Z; Li J; Sinjab K; Mendonca G; Yu H; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 30346631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]