These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36513267)

  • 1. Consistent inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation of the average treatment effect with mismeasured time-dependent confounders.
    Yan Y; Ren M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):517-535. PubMed ID: 36513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted estimation of causal parameters in the presence of error-contaminated and time-dependent confounders.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Biom J; 2019 Nov; 61(6):1507-1525. PubMed ID: 31449324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal inference with measurement error in outcomes: Bias analysis and estimation methods.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2049-2068. PubMed ID: 29241426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.
    Yi GY; Chen LP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):691-711. PubMed ID: 36694932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
    Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-varying effect moderation using the structural nested mean model: estimation using inverse-weighted regression with residuals.
    Almirall D; Griffin BA; McCaffrey DF; Ramchand R; Yuen RA; Murphy SA
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3466-87. PubMed ID: 23873437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighted causal inference methods with mismeasured covariates and misclassified outcomes.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1835-1854. PubMed ID: 30609095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5642-5655. PubMed ID: 27549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of longitudinal marginal structural models.
    Bryan J; Yu Z; Van Der Laan MJ
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jul; 5(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 15208200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust estimation of the causal effect of time-varying neighborhood factors on health outcomes.
    Robbins MW; Griffin BA; Shih RA; Slaughter ME
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(5):544-561. PubMed ID: 31820833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation.
    Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.
    Regier MD; Moodie EE; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 24445244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.
    Raad H; Cornelius V; Chan S; Williamson E; Cro S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 32293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of mis-specification of the treatment model on estimates from a marginal structural model.
    Lefebvre G; Delaney JA; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3629-42. PubMed ID: 18254127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies.
    Parast L; Griffin BA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):161-182. PubMed ID: 26880366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.