These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36514035)
1. The comparison of biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders on late adolescence with unilateral cleft palate: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Meng WY; Ma YQ; Shi B; Liu RK; Wang XM BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):600. PubMed ID: 36514035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress and displacement pattern evaluation using two different palatal expanders in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Mathew A; Nagachandran KS; Vijayalakshmi D Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):38. PubMed ID: 27800592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Lin L; Ahn HW; Kim SJ; Moon SC; Kim SH; Nelson G Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 25490552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex--a finite element method (FEM) analysis. MacGinnis M; Chu H; Youssef G; Wu KW; Machado AW; Moon W Prog Orthod; 2014 Aug; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 25242527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical behavior of three maxillary expanders in cleft lip and palate: a finite element study. Patiño AMB; Rodrigues MP; Pessoa RS; Rubinsky SY; Kim KB; Soares CJ; Almeida GA Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e010. PubMed ID: 38597509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution and displacement by different bone-borne palatal expanders with micro-implants: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Lee HK; Bayome M; Ahn CS; Kim SH; Kim KB; Mo SS; Kook YA Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 23148112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Alt-RAMEC With Facemask in Patients With Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate (UCLP) Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Finite Element Modeling-A Clinical Prospective Study. Singh S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Srivastava A Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Feb; 59(2):166-176. PubMed ID: 33754882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different palatal expanders with miniscrews in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A non-linear finite element analysis. Koç O; Koç N; Jacob HB Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(1):e2423195. PubMed ID: 38451569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal outcomes of a rapid maxillary expander with differential opening in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate: A prospective clinical trial. Garib D; Lauris RC; Calil LR; Alves AC; Janson G; De Almeida AM; Cevidanes LH; Lauris JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Oct; 150(4):564-574. PubMed ID: 27692413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis. Lee SC; Park JH; Bayome M; Kim KB; Araujo EA; Kook YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):638-48. PubMed ID: 24785928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects on maxillary protraction of the craniofacial skeleton with cleft lip and palate after alveolar bone graft. Chen Z; Pan X; Shao Q; Chen Z J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 23524712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of alveolar cleft bone graft on the maxillofacial biomechanical stabilities of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Tian T; Huang HY; Wang W; Shi B; Zheng Q; Li CH Biomed Eng Online; 2022 May; 21(1):31. PubMed ID: 35596229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molar inclination and surrounding alveolar bone change relative to the design of bone-borne maxillary expanders: Moon HW; Kim MJ; Ahn HW; Kim SJ; Kim SH; Chung KR; Nelson G Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31461306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of rapid palatal expansion on the craniofacial skeleton with cleft palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Pan X; Qian Y; Yu J; Wang D; Tang Y; Shen G Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Mar; 44(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 17328641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial. de Almeida AM; Ozawa TO; Alves ACM; Janson G; Lauris JRP; Ioshida MSY; Garib DG Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1789-1799. PubMed ID: 27550292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effects of maxillary expansion on a patient with cleft palate: A finite element analysis. Lee H; Nguyen A; Hong C; Hoang P; Pham J; Ting K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 27476365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Displacement and stress distribution by different bone-borne palatal expanders with facemask: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Park JH; Bayome M; Zahrowski JJ; Kook YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 28024761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Figueiredo DS; Bartolomeo FU; Romualdo CR; Palomo JM; Horta MC; Andrade I; Oliveira DD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 24975001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]