These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36514553)
1. Different proxies, different stories? Imperfect correlations and different determinants of fitness in bighorn sheep. Van de Walle J; Larue B; Pigeon G; Pelletier F Ecol Evol; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e9582. PubMed ID: 36514553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the best fitness measure in wild populations? A case study on the power of short-term fitness proxies to predict reproductive value. Alif Ž; Dunning J; Chik HYJ; Burke T; Schroeder J PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0260905. PubMed ID: 35452482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants and long-term costs of early reproduction in males of a long-lived polygynous mammal. Ritchot Y; Festa-Bianchet M; Coltman D; Pelletier F Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(11):6829-6845. PubMed ID: 34141259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term studies of bighorn sheep and mountain goats reveal fitness costs of reproduction. Festa-Bianchet M; Côté SD; Hamel S; Pelletier F J Anim Ecol; 2019 Aug; 88(8):1118-1133. PubMed ID: 31183864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individuals' expected genetic contributions to future generations, reproductive value, and short-term metrics of fitness in free-living song sparrows ( Reid JM; Nietlisbach P; Wolak ME; Keller LF; Arcese P Evol Lett; 2019 Jun; 3(3):271-285. PubMed ID: 31171983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection and genetic (co)variance in bighorn sheep. Coltman DW; O'Donoghue P; Hogg JT; Festa-Bianchet M Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1372-82. PubMed ID: 16050112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in relationships between habitat use and reproductive performance in Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Regan CE; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM; Crawley MJ Ecol Lett; 2016 Feb; 19(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 26610734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Translating effects of inbreeding depression on component vital rates to overall population growth in endangered bighorn sheep. Johnson HE; Mills LS; Wehausen JD; Stephenson TR; Luikart G Conserv Biol; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 22070275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory relationships between adult lifetime reproductive success and fitness surrogates in a Drosophila littoralis population. Pekkala N; Kotiaho JS; Puurtinen M PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24560. PubMed ID: 21931756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative genetics and sex-specific selection on sexually dimorphic traits in bighorn sheep. Poissant J; Wilson AJ; Festa-Bianchet M; Hogg JT; Coltman DW Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):623-8. PubMed ID: 18211870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution. Brommer JE; Gustafsson L; Pietiäinen H; Merilä J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):505-17. PubMed ID: 15122499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct and indirect effects of early-life environment on lifetime fitness of bighorn ewes. Pigeon G; Pelletier F Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Jan; 285(1870):. PubMed ID: 29321295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic consequences of genetic rescue in an insular population of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Miller JM; Poissant J; Hogg JT; Coltman DW Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(7):1583-96. PubMed ID: 22257293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative genetics of life-history traits in a long-lived wild mammal. Réale D; Festa-Bianchet M Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Dec; 85(Pt 6):593-603. PubMed ID: 11240626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep. Robinson MR; Pilkington JG; Clutton-Brock TH; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LE Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2168-81. PubMed ID: 17133873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep. Poissant J; Hogg JT; Davis CS; Miller JM; Maddox JF; Coltman DW BMC Genomics; 2010 Sep; 11():524. PubMed ID: 20920197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The long-lasting legacy of reproduction: lifetime reproductive success shapes expected genetic contributions of humans after 10 generations. Young EA; Chesterton E; Lummaa V; Postma E; Dugdale HL Proc Biol Sci; 2023 May; 290(1998):20230287. PubMed ID: 37161329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-genome resequencing uncovers molecular signatures of natural and sexual selection in wild bighorn sheep. Kardos M; Luikart G; Bunch R; Dewey S; Edwards W; McWilliam S; Stephenson J; Allendorf FW; Hogg JT; Kijas J Mol Ecol; 2015 Nov; 24(22):5616-32. PubMed ID: 26454263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An individual-based modelling approach to estimate landscape connectivity for bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Allen CH; Parrott L; Kyle C PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2001. PubMed ID: 27168997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]