These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36516117)

  • 1. Polarization and trust in the evolution of vaccine discourse on Twitter during COVID-19.
    Ojea Quintana I; Reimann R; Cheong M; Alfano M; Klein C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277292. PubMed ID: 36516117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Role of Influential Actors in Fostering the Polarized COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Mixed Methods of Machine Learning and Inductive Coding.
    Hagen L; Fox A; O'Leary H; Dyson D; Walker K; Lengacher CA; Hernandez R
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(1):e34231. PubMed ID: 35814809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt.
    Dolman AJ; Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Aldrich DP; Kim D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 45(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 35077546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.
    Lyu JC; Han EL; Luli GK
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e24435. PubMed ID: 34115608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets.
    Zaidi Z; Ye M; Samon F; Jama A; Gopalakrishnan B; Gu C; Karunasekera S; Evans J; Kashima Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e45069. PubMed ID: 37552535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of the Negative Discourse Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: Topic Modeling Study and an Annotated Data Set of Twitter Posts.
    Lindelöf G; Aledavood T; Keller B
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e41319. PubMed ID: 36877804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polarization, the Pandemic, and Public Trust in Health System Actors.
    Del Ponte A; Gerber AS; Patashnik EM
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2024 Jun; 49(3):375-401. PubMed ID: 37988069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of Public Opinion on COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan: Large-Scale Twitter Data Analysis.
    Kobayashi R; Takedomi Y; Nakayama Y; Suda T; Uno T; Hashimoto T; Toyoda M; Yoshinaga N; Kitsuregawa M; Rocha LEC
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Dec; 24(12):e41928. PubMed ID: 36343186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Political variations in pandemic lifestyles and COVID-19 vaccination by age cohort in the United States.
    Dowd-Arrow B; Burdette AM; Smith A
    Prev Med; 2023 Jul; 172():107525. PubMed ID: 37164162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On symbols and scripts: The politics of the American COVID-19 response.
    Kenworthy N; Koon AD; Mendenhall E
    Glob Public Health; 2021; 16(8-9):1424-1438. PubMed ID: 33736578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study.
    Hussain A; Tahir A; Hussain Z; Sheikh Z; Gogate M; Dashtipour K; Ali A; Sheikh A
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Apr; 23(4):e26627. PubMed ID: 33724919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaccine discourse during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: Topical structure and source patterns informing efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy.
    Hwang J; Su MH; Jiang X; Lian R; Tveleneva A; Shah D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271394. PubMed ID: 35895626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twitter discourse reveals geographical and temporal variation in concerns about COVID-19 vaccines in the United States.
    Guntuku SC; Buttenheim AM; Sherman G; Merchant RM
    Vaccine; 2021 Jul; 39(30):4034-4038. PubMed ID: 34140171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes.
    Facciani M; Lazić A; Viggiano G; McKay T
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Jul; 328():116004. PubMed ID: 37295206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. People's Willingness to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 Despite Their Safety Concerns: Twitter Poll Analysis.
    Eibensteiner F; Ritschl V; Nawaz FA; Fazel SS; Tsagkaris C; Kulnik ST; Crutzen R; Klager E; Völkl-Kernstock S; Schaden E; Kletecka-Pulker M; Willschke H; Atanasov AG
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Apr; 23(4):e28973. PubMed ID: 33872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partisan Differences in Legislators' Discussion of Vaccination on Twitter During the COVID-19 Era: Natural Language Processing Analysis.
    Engel-Rebitzer E; Stokes DC; Meisel ZF; Purtle J; Doyle R; Buttenheim AM
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(1):e32372. PubMed ID: 35229075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Of pathogens and party lines: Social conservatism positively associates with COVID-19 precautions among U.S. Democrats but not Republicans.
    Samore T; Fessler DMT; Sparks AM; Holbrook C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253326. PubMed ID: 34185786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social media use and vaccination among Democrats and Republicans: Informational and normative influences.
    DeMora SL; Granados Samayoa JA; Albarracín D
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jul; 352():117031. PubMed ID: 38850678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public perception of COVID-19 vaccines through analysis of Twitter content and users.
    Saleh SN; McDonald SA; Basit MA; Kumar S; Arasaratnam RJ; Perl TM; Lehmann CU; Medford RJ
    Vaccine; 2023 Jul; 41(33):4844-4853. PubMed ID: 37385887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study.
    Fridman A; Gershon R; Gneezy A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250123. PubMed ID: 33861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.