These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36516666)

  • 21. The Worst-Motive Fallacy: A Negativity Bias in Motive Attribution.
    Walmsley J; O'Madagain C
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1430-1438. PubMed ID: 33085928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wrong or merely prohibited: Special treatment of strict liability in intuitive moral judgment.
    Giffin C; Lombrozo T
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):707-720. PubMed ID: 27631401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceived moral responsibility for attitude-based discrimination.
    Redford L; Ratliff KA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):279-96. PubMed ID: 26250047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis.
    McDonald K; Graves R; Yin S; Weese T; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104703. PubMed ID: 33965894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social perception in moral judgments of interpersonal transgressions.
    Adams GS; O'Connor KS; Belmi P
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():177-181. PubMed ID: 34688999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pragmatic, constructive, and reconstructive memory influences on the hindsight bias.
    Salmen K; Ermark FKG; Fiedler K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Feb; 30(1):331-340. PubMed ID: 35953669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The boundary conditions of the liking bias in moral character judgments.
    Bocian K; Szarek KM; Miazek K; Baryla W; Wojciszke B
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17217. PubMed ID: 36241672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
    Chakroff A; Young L
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deconstructing moral character judgments.
    Hartman R; Blakey W; Gray K
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Feb; 43():205-212. PubMed ID: 34418790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reducing the hindsight bias utilizing attorney closing arguments.
    Stallard MJ; Worthington DL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Dec; 22(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 9874927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The logic of universalization guides moral judgment.
    Levine S; Kleiman-Weiner M; Schulz L; Tenenbaum J; Cushman F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(42):26158-26169. PubMed ID: 33008885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are Children Perceived to Be Morally Exceptional? Different Sets of Psychological Variables Predict Adults' Moral Judgments About Adults and Young Children.
    White CJM; Schaller M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1147-1162. PubMed ID: 29561230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanism of the better-than-average effect in moral issues: Asymmetrical causal attribution across moral (vs. immoral) contexts.
    Han K; Kim MY
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103575. PubMed ID: 35367637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The road to heaven is paved with effort: Perceived effort amplifies moral judgment.
    Bigman YE; Tamir M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1654-1669. PubMed ID: 27736131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation effects and hindsight bias.
    Calvillo DP
    J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25302589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Paying for someone else's mistake: the effect of bystander negligence on perpetrator blame.
    Critcher CR; Pizarro DA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1357-70. PubMed ID: 18599657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction.
    Sellaro R; Güroǧlu B; Nitsche MA; van den Wildenberg WP; Massaro V; Durieux J; Hommel B; Colzato LS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():400-8. PubMed ID: 26375450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hindsight bias in gustatory judgments.
    Pohl RF; Schwarz S; Sczesny S; Stahlberg D
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 12693195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.