150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517017)
1. Influence of monolithic restorative materials on the implant-abutment interface of hybrid abutment crowns: An in vitro investigation.
Graf T; Schweiger J; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Schubert O; Güth JF
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):450-459. PubMed ID: 36517017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strength of implant-supported lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations after thermomechanical aging.
Gil A; Eliades G; Özcan M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Ioannidis A
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 36632986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear resistance of CAD/CAM one-piece screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns made from different restorative materials.
Elsayed A; Chaar MS; Kern M; Libecki W; Yazigi C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 37408517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of the restorative material on the mechanical behavior of screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns.
Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS; Libecki W; Elsayed A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103988. PubMed ID: 32799134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture analysis of monolithic CAD-CAM crowns.
Kashkari A; Yilmaz B; Brantley WA; Schricker SR; Johnston WM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):346-352. PubMed ID: 30821101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
Taha D; Sabet A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
