BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517017)

  • 21. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misfit and fracture load of implant-supported monolithic crowns in zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate.
    Gomes RS; Souza CMC; Bergamo ETP; Bordin D; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(3):282-289. PubMed ID: 28678947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An investigation on fatigue, fracture resistance, and color properties of aesthetic CAD/CAM monolithic ceramics.
    Fouda AM; Atta O; Özcan M; Stawarczyk B; Glaum R; Bourauel C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2653-2665. PubMed ID: 36574045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
    Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
    Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
    Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
    Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
    Elsayed A; Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS
    Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns.
    Sieper K; Wille S; Kern M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():342-348. PubMed ID: 28662443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.
    DuVall NB; DeReis SP; Vandewalle KS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):522-530. PubMed ID: 33174333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
    Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
    Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height.
    Alseddiek A; Al-Zordk W; Attia A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):784. PubMed ID: 37875871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns.
    Preis V; Hahnel S; Behr M; Bein L; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):427-433. PubMed ID: 28185678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fatigue performance of adhesively luted glass or polycrystalline CAD-CAM monolithic crowns.
    Alves DM; Cadore-Rodrigues AC; Prochnow C; Burgo TAL; Spazzin AO; Bacchi A; Valandro LF; Rocha Pereira GK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 32636073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
    Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
    Emam M; Eldimeery A; Salah T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of screw-access channels on the fracture resistance of 3 types of ceramic implant-supported crowns.
    Hussien AN; Rayyan MM; Sayed NM; Segaan LG; Goodacre CJ; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 26948081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.