BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517267)

  • 1. Causes and diagnostic utility of musculoskeletal MRI recall examinations.
    Komarraju A; Maxwell C; Kung JW; Mhuircheartaigh JN; Kim W; Wu JS
    Clin Radiol; 2023 Mar; 78(3):e221-e226. PubMed ID: 36517267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient Recall Imaging in the Ambulatory Setting.
    Gyftopoulos S; Kim D; Aaltonen E; Horwitz LI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):787-91. PubMed ID: 26866338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common Causes of Outpatient CT and MRI Callback Examinations: Opportunities for Improvement.
    Liles AL; Francis IR; Kalia V; Kim J; Davenport MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):487-492. PubMed ID: 31887096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overnight attending radiologist coverage decreases imaging-related emergency department recalls by at least 90.
    Mughli RA; Durrant E; Baia Medeiros DT; Shelton D; Robins J; Qamar SR; O'Keeffe ME; Berger FH
    Emerg Radiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):549-555. PubMed ID: 33428044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic Protocolling of Non-contrast Musculoskeletal MRIs Does Not Result in Increase in Patient Recall Rates for Contrast-Enhanced Studies.
    Ashikyan O; Xia S; Chhabra A
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38184417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a PACS Embedded System for Communicating Radiologist to Technologist Learning Opportunities and Patient Callbacks.
    Glazer DI; Zhao AH; Lacson R; Burk KS; DiPiro PJ; Kapoor N; Khorasani R
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2022; 51(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 34836721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technologist Productivity and Accuracy in Assigning Protocols for Abdominal CT and MRI Examinations at an Academic Medical Center: Implications for Physician Workload.
    Glazer DI; Alper DP; Lee LK; Wach RL; Hooton SM; Boland GW; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):1003-1007. PubMed ID: 31216200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologist age and diagnostic errors.
    Lamoureux C; Hanna TN; Callaway E; Bruno MA; Weber S; Sprecher D; Johnson TD
    Emerg Radiol; 2023 Oct; 30(5):577-587. PubMed ID: 37458917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Radiologist-Driven Change-Order Requests on Outpatient CT and MRI Examinations.
    Pourjabbar S; Cavallo JJ; Arango J; Tocino I; Staib LH; Imanzadeh A; Forman HP; Pahade JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 31954708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statement of the German Roentgen Society, German Society of Neuroradiology, and Society of German-speaking Pediatric Radiologists on Requirements for the Performance and Reporting of MR Imaging Examinations Outside of Radiology.
    Hunold P; Bucher AM; Sandstede J; Janka R; Fritz LB; Regier M; Loose R; Barkhausen J; Mentzel HJ; Zimmer C; Antoch G; ; ;
    Rofo; 2021 Sep; 193(9):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 33831956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period.
    Herzog R; Elgort DR; Flanders AE; Moley PJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):554-561. PubMed ID: 27867079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient, Radiologist, and Examination Characteristics Affecting Screening Mammography Recall Rates in a Large Academic Practice.
    Giess CS; Wang A; Ip IK; Lacson R; Pourjabbar S; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):411-418. PubMed ID: 30037704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency and Clinical Utility of Alerts for Intra-Institutional Radiologist Discrepant Opinions.
    DiPiro PJ; Licaros A; Zhao AH; Glazer DI; Healey MJ; Curley PJ; Giess CS; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Apr; 20(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 36841320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
    Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who Refers Musculoskeletal Extremity Imaging Examinations to Radiologists?
    Harkey P; Duszak R; Gyftopoulos S; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Apr; 210(4):834-841. PubMed ID: 29489411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency and reasons for extra sequences in clinical abdominal MRI examinations.
    Schreiber-Zinaman J; Rosenkrantz AB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jan; 42(1):306-311. PubMed ID: 27549101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Reduce Rescan and Recall Rates in Clinical MRI Examinations.
    Sreekumari A; Shanbhag D; Yeo D; Foo T; Pilitsis J; Polzin J; Patil U; Coblentz A; Kapadia A; Khinda J; Boutet A; Port J; Hancu I
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 30606726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidental abdominopelvic findings on expanded field-of-view lumbar spinal MRI: frequency, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation by neuroimaging and body imaging radiologists.
    Maxwell AW; Keating DP; Nickerson JP
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Feb; 70(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25439794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Second opinions in orthopedic oncology imaging: can fellowship training reduce clinically significant discrepancies?
    Rozenberg A; Kenneally BE; Abraham JA; Strogus K; Roedl JB; Morrison WB; Zoga AC
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Jan; 48(1):143-147. PubMed ID: 30003278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.