These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517298)
21. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mortality from abortion after Roe vs Wade. Smargisso DM; Lester D Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):780. PubMed ID: 12530723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs. Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. When rights collide. Forte DF Health Matrix; 1989; 7(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 10294678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Overturning Roe v. Wade: the long road ahead. Colson CW J Christ Nurs; 1988; 5(3):32. PubMed ID: 3392649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The constitutional right to abortion. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Jan; 79(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 2335767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The End of Ziegler M Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Harris v. McRae: whatever happened to the Roe v. Wade abortion right? Crocker L Pepperdine Law Rev; 1981; 8(3):861-97. PubMed ID: 11650497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause. Looper-Friedman SE New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Why Roe v. Wade must be defended. The Lancet Lancet; 2022 May; 399(10338):1845. PubMed ID: 35569449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 1. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 4740289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade. Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Of causes and clients: two tales of Roe v. Wade. McMunigal KC Hastings Law J; 1996 Mar; 47(3):779-819. PubMed ID: 11658088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Telemedicine, Medication Abortion, and Access After Allsworth JE Am J Public Health; 2022 Aug; 112(8):1086-1088. PubMed ID: 35830673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]