These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517552)

  • 1. Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening.
    Costa S; Verberckmoes B; Castle PE; Arbyn M
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Mar; 128(5):805-813. PubMed ID: 36517552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invitation strategy of vaginal HPV self-sampling to improve participation in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Wong HY; Wong EL
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):2461. PubMed ID: 39256726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.
    Arbyn M; Smith SB; Temin S; Sultana F; Castle P;
    BMJ; 2018 Dec; 363():k4823. PubMed ID: 30518635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing cervical cancer using HPV self-sampling: direct mailing of test-kits increases screening participation more than timely opt-in procedures - a randomized controlled trial.
    Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):273. PubMed ID: 29523108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.
    Brewer N; Bartholomew K; Maxwell A; Grant J; McPherson G; Wihongi H; Bromhead C; Scott N; Crengle S; Cunningham C; Douwes J; Potter JD
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1198. PubMed ID: 31815615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Verdoodt F; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P; Racey CS; Snijders PJ; Arbyn M
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 51(16):2375-85. PubMed ID: 26296294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
    Tranberg M; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Jensen JS; Svanholm H; Andersen B
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Nov; 16(1):835. PubMed ID: 27809810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
    Aasbø G; Tropè A; Nygård M; Christiansen IK; Baasland I; Iversen GA; Munk AC; Christiansen MH; Presthus GK; Undem K; Bjørge T; Castle PE; Hansen BT
    Br J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 127(10):1816-1826. PubMed ID: 35995936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: A randomised feasibility study in Estonia.
    Veerus P; Hallik R; Jänes J; Jõers K; Paapsi K; Laidra K; Innos K
    J Med Screen; 2022 Mar; 29(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 34694179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
    Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology.
    Zehbe I; Jackson R; Wood B; Weaver B; Escott N; Severini A; Krajden M; Bishop L; Morrisseau K; Ogilvie G; Burchell AN; Little J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011754. PubMed ID: 27855089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials.
    Di Gennaro G; Licata F; Trovato A; Bianco A
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1003461. PubMed ID: 36568753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
    Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equal prevalence of severe cervical dysplasia by HPV self-sampling and by midwife-collected samples for primary HPV screening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Hellsten C; Ernstson A; Bodelsson G; Forslund O; Borgfeldt C
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2021 Jul; 30(4):334-340. PubMed ID: 34010238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operational experiences from the general implementation of HPV self-sampling to Danish screening non-attenders.
    Ejegod DM; Pedersen H; Pedersen BT; Serizawa R; Bonde J
    Prev Med; 2022 Jul; 160():107096. PubMed ID: 35594924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with cervical cancer screening participation by send-to-all and opt-in HPV self-sampling: Who benefits? Results from a randomized controlled trial among long-term non-attending women in Norway.
    Hansen BT; Nygård M; Castle PE; Burger EA; Aasbø G
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Sep; 155(6):1053-1067. PubMed ID: 38751040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost-effectiveness of opt-in and send-to-all HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: The Equalscreen randomized controlled trial.
    Knauss T; Hansen BT; Pedersen K; Aasbø G; Kunst N; Burger EA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 168():39-47. PubMed ID: 36371904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.
    Aarnio R; Östensson E; Olovsson M; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jul; 20(1):645. PubMed ID: 32660432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
    Staley H; Shiraz A; Shreeve N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Gajjar K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):CD002834. PubMed ID: 34694000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptability of vaginal self-sampling with high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: a French questionnaire-based study.
    Bertucci M; Bonnet E; Satger L; Kreiche A; Chappert JL; Loy-Morel S; Segondy M; Daurès JP; Boulle N
    Women Health; 2021 Jan; 61(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 33106125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.