These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36517988)

  • 1. The credibility plot for extreme explanations and all explanations in between: a reply.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Apr; 78(4):536. PubMed ID: 36517988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The credibility plot for extreme explanations and all explanations in between.
    Seretny M; Barlow J; Sidebotham D
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Apr; 78(4):535. PubMed ID: 36480424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The credibility plot for extreme explanations and all explanations in between.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Jan; 78(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 36351449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Why does rain fall?": children prefer to learn from an informant who uses noncircular explanations.
    Corriveau KH; Kurkul KE
    Child Dev; 2014; 85(5):1827-35. PubMed ID: 24646210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey.
    Evaniew N; van der Watt L; Bhandari M; Ghert M; Aleem I; Drew B; Guyatt G
    Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 26002725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal explanations of depression and treatment credibility in adults with untreated depression: Examining attribution theory.
    Zimmermann M; Papa A
    Psychol Psychother; 2020 Sep; 93(3):537-554. PubMed ID: 31400077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rock Climbing, Risk, and Recognition.
    Langseth T; Salvesen Ø
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1793. PubMed ID: 30319497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints on equifinality: goals are good explanations only for controllable outcomes.
    McClure J; Densley L; Liu JH; Allen M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2001 Mar; 40(Pt 1):99-115. PubMed ID: 11329836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal-Clock Models and Misguided Views of Mechanistic Explanations: A Reply to Eckard & Lattal (2020).
    Sanabria F
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2020 Dec; 43(4):779-790. PubMed ID: 33381688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution?
    Atherton OE; Chung JM; Harris K; Rohrer JM; Condon DM; Cheung F; Vazire S; Lucas RE; Donnellan MB; Mroczek DK; Soto CJ; Antonoplis S; Damian RI; Funder DC; Srivastava S; Fraley RC; Jach H; Roberts BW; Smillie LD; Sun J; Tackett JL; Weston SJ; Harden KP; Corker KS
    Personal Sci; 2021; 2():. PubMed ID: 35434719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of causal explanations for social anxiety disorder on stigma and treatment perceptions.
    Schofield CA; Abdul-Chani M; Gaudiano BA
    J Ment Health; 2020 Feb; 29(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 30741047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Representing, Running, and Revising Mental Models: A Computational Model.
    Friedman S; Forbus K; Sherin B
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1110-1145. PubMed ID: 29280505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explainable machine learning approach to predict extubation in critically ill ventilated patients: a retrospective study in central Taiwan.
    Pai KC; Su SA; Chan MC; Wu CL; Chao WC
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):351. PubMed ID: 36376785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design Implications for Explanations: A Case Study on Supporting Reflective Assessment of Potentially Misleading Videos.
    Inel O; Duricic T; Kaur H; Lex E; Tintarev N
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():712072. PubMed ID: 34651121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical competence/clinical credibility.
    Goorapah D
    Nurse Educ Today; 1997 Aug; 17(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9313561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lay Americans' views of why scientists disagree with each other.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Oct; 27(7):824-835. PubMed ID: 29076775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgements of likelihood.
    Sloman SA
    Cognition; 1994 Jul; 52(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 7924197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens.
    Cutcliffe JR; McKenna HP
    J Adv Nurs; 1999 Aug; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 10457239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improve the Deep Learning Models in Forestry Based on Explanations and Expertise.
    Cheng X; Doosthosseini A; Kunkel J
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():902105. PubMed ID: 35677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial impression of trustworthiness biases statement credibility unless suppressed by facemask.
    Marini M; Paglieri F; Ansani A; Caruana F; Viola M
    Curr Psychol; 2022 Jun; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 35698486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.