222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36518087)
1. Prenatal genetic counseling in states hostile to abortion in the final days of Roe v. Wade: A qualitative study.
Getchell G; Horan S; Sagaser KG; Hercher L
J Genet Couns; 2023 Jun; 32(3):584-597. PubMed ID: 36518087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal genetic counselors' perceptions of the impact of abortion legislation on counseling and access in the United States.
Jayaraman S; Koenig S; Fiddler M; Simi E; Goldenberg A; Magasi S; Wicklund C
J Genet Couns; 2021 Dec; 30(6):1671-1682. PubMed ID: 34096144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.
Myers C; Jones R; Upadhyay U
Contraception; 2019 Nov; 100(5):367-373. PubMed ID: 31376381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The End of
Ziegler M
Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
Holman EJ
JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implications for Prenatal Genetic Testing in the United States After the Reversal of Roe v Wade.
Raymond MB; Barbera JP; Boudova S; Vinekar K; Horgan R; McLaren R; Al-Kouatly HB
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 141(3):445-454. PubMed ID: 36649348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.
Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?
Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
