These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36518618)
1. AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives. Mun F; Badin D; Snow M; Harris AB; LaPorte DM; Aiyer AA JB JS Open Access; 2022; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 36518618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors. Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day. Keshwani S; Sullivan G; Govekar H; Perez CB; Shah A; Schimpke S J Surg Educ; 2024 Nov; 81(11):1784-1791. PubMed ID: 39317124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspectives on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Tawfik AM; Imbergamo C; Chen V; Filtes P; Butler A; Gatt C; Katt BM J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2021 Oct; 5(10):. PubMed ID: 34605791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual Interviews Are Not Adequate Replacements for In-Person Interviews for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Program Directors and Applicants. Tanguilig G; Kraeutler MJ; Mulcahey MK Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2024 Feb; 6(1):100835. PubMed ID: 38155814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ophthalmology Residency Match in the Covid-19 Era: Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of the 2020-2021 Application Cycle. Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 33825672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful Applicant and Program Director Perspectives on the Virtual Residency Selection Process for Canadian Surgical Subspecialties. Abi-Rafeh J; Sebag V; ElHawary H; Zammit D; Gilardino MS Plast Surg (Oakv); 2024 May; 32(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 38681250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Robinson KA; Shin B; Gangadharan SP J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 33250429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual Interviews for Sports Medicine Fellowship Positions Save Time and Money but Don't Replace In-Person Meetings. Clark SC; Kraeutler MJ; McCarty EC; Mulcahey MK Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 4(2):e607-e615. PubMed ID: 35494269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors. Ponterio JM; Keslar M; Lakhi NA Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2054304. PubMed ID: 35315741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated vascular surgery applicants' perspectives of virtual residency interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 application cycle. Coluccio M; Shridhar N; Liang T; Harris L J Vasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 77(2):634-639.e2. PubMed ID: 36150637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual interviewing in the MedPhys match: Experiences of applicants and programs. Juang T; Landers A; Rodrigues AE; Schubert L; Hendrickson KRG J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e14007. PubMed ID: 37118926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Virtual Interview Format on Urology Residency Interviews: A Survey of Program Directors. Ferry AM; Asaad M; Elmorsi R; Rajesh A; Greene KL; Mayer WA; Maricevich RS Urol Pract; 2022 Mar; 9(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 37145696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Virtual Recruitment Onion: Peeling Back the Layers of the Interview Season During the COVID-era. Han AY; Obiri-Yeboah D; French JC; Lipman JM J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 34446384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing Perceptions About the Dermatology Residency Application Process Among Applicants and Program Directors: 2020-2022. Rinderknecht FB; Bailey KC; Novack DE; Rosenblatt AE; Dunleavy D; Naemi BD; Rosman IS; Ahmed A; Worswick S Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57864. PubMed ID: 38725733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preference Signaling for Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants: A Survey of Residency Program Directors. Mun F; Suresh KV; Li TP; Aiyer AA; LaPorte DM J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Dec; 30(23):1140-1145. PubMed ID: 36094792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interviewing Amidst a Pandemic: Perspectives of US Residency Program Directors on the Virtual Format. Asaad M; Elmorsi R; Ferry AM; Rajesh A; Maricevich RS J Eur CME; 2022; 11(1):2087397. PubMed ID: 35711724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Virtual Interview Format for Resident Recruitment as a Result of COVID-19 Restrictions: Residency Program Directors' Perspectives. Ponterio JM; Levy L; Lakhi NA Acad Med; 2022 Sep; 97(9):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 35507455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual Interviews in the Era of COVID-19: Expectations and Perceptions of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Candidates and Program Directors. Brueggeman DA; Via GG; Froehle AW; Krishnamurthy AB JB JS Open Access; 2021; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 34386687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residency interviews in the digital era. Beshar I; Tate WJ; Bernstein D Postgrad Med J; 2022 Dec; 98(1166):892-894. PubMed ID: 34611038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]