211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36520224)
1. Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hayden DM; Korous KM; Brooks E; Tuuhetaufa F; King-Mullins EM; Martin AM; Grimes C; Rogers CR
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3306-3320. PubMed ID: 36520224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in the Use of Laparoscopy and Robotics for Colorectal Cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens J; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jul; 29(7):926-933. PubMed ID: 31094645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.
Morton AJ; Simpson A; Humes DJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38078978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; Warrier SK; Heriot A
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2806-2820. PubMed ID: 34318575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method to objectively assess robotic assistance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Ngu JC; Teo NZ
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2251. PubMed ID: 33686793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lenfant L; Canlorbe G; Belghiti J; Kreaden US; Hebert AE; Nikpayam M; Uzan C; Azaïs H
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2647-2662. PubMed ID: 37856058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insurance Disparities in Access to Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.
Childers CP; Uppal A; Tillman M; Chang GJ; Tran Cao HS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):3560-3568. PubMed ID: 36943527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of on-demand robotics in colorectal surgery: first cases.
Hahnloser D; Rrupa D; Grass F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8594-8600. PubMed ID: 37488444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trinh BB; Hauch AT; Buell JF; Kandil E
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Bernier GV; Flum DR; Kumar AS; Moonka R; Thirlby RC; Simianu VV
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33206328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Operations.
Hajirawala LN; Leonardi C; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):2129-2131. PubMed ID: 34318696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
