212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36520224)
21. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Trinh BB; Jackson NR; Hauch AT; Hu T; Kandil E
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of primary robotic hernia repair.
Tatarian T; McPartland C; Nie L; Yang J; Spaniolas K; Docimo S; Pryor AD
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4829-4833. PubMed ID: 36138250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Overview of Robotic Colorectal Surgery Adoption and Training in Brazil.
Alves Martins BA; Filho OM; Ghezzi TL; Melani AGF; Romagnolo LGC; Moreira Júnior H; de Almeida JPP; Araújo SEA; de Sousa JB; de Almeida RM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Sep; 59(9):. PubMed ID: 37763794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic colorectal surgery and future directions.
Erozkan K; Gorgun E
Am J Surg; 2024 Apr; 230():91-98. PubMed ID: 37953126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The RECOURSE Study: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Associated With Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Procedures for Endometrial, Cervical, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Leitao MM; Kreaden US; Laudone V; Park BJ; Pappou EP; Davis JW; Rice DC; Chang GJ; Rossi EC; Hebert AE; Slee A; Gonen M
Ann Surg; 2023 Mar; 277(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 36073772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trends and disparities in access to minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (midp): an eight-year analysis from the national cancer database.
Jehan FS; Khreiss M; Seth A; Aziz H
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):52. PubMed ID: 38280048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Kawka M; Fong Y; Gall TMH
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6672-6681. PubMed ID: 37442833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.
Mayo JS; Brazer ML; Bogenberger KJ; Tavares KB; Conrad RJ; Lustik MB; Gillern SM; Park CW; Richards CR
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2805-2816. PubMed ID: 32591939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Chok AY; Zhao Y; Tan IE; Au MKH; Tan EJKW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Mar; 38(1):86. PubMed ID: 36988723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Klajner S
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14359-70. PubMed ID: 25339823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The rise of robotic colorectal surgery: better for patients and better for surgeons.
Yeung TM; Larkins KM; Warrier SK; Heriot AG
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 38329595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Ghani KR; Sukumar S; Sammon JD; Rogers CG; Trinh QD; Menon M
J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 24184365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Milone M; Manigrasso M; Vertaldi S; Velotti N; Aprea G; Maione F; Gennarelli N; De Simone G; De Conno B; Pesce M; Sarnelli G; De Palma GD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Dec; 32(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 31274153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3558-3566. PubMed ID: 31346749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.
Chan YY; Durbin-Johnson B; Sturm RM; Kurzrock EA
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):49.e1-49.e6. PubMed ID: 28288777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
