These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36520782)

  • 1. Impact of the Second Examination of the Proximal Colon on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Yang Q; Zhu X; Wu Z; Leng F; Shu X; Yang L
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2023 Jan; 14(1):e00557. PubMed ID: 36520782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Shan K; Lu H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Xu L; Wang W; Hu C; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 33971824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two vs One Forward View Examination of Right Colon on Adenoma Detection: An International Multicenter Randomized Trial.
    Tang RSY; Lee JWJ; Chang LC; Ong DEH; Chiu HM; Matsuda T; Kim HS; Sekiguchi M; Leong RW; Ho AMY; Lam TYT; Tse YK; Lin L; Yeoh KG; Lau JYW; Sung JJY;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):372-380.e2. PubMed ID: 33065307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of segmental re-examination of proximal colon for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Guo CG; Zhang F; Ji R; Li Y; Li L; Zuo XL; Li YQ
    Endoscopy; 2017 Mar; 49(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 28129661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proximal retroflexion versus second forward view of the right colon during screening colonoscopy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Núñez Rodríguez MH; Díez Redondo P; Riu Pons F; Cimavilla M; Hernández L; Loza A; Pérez-Miranda M
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Jul; 8(6):725-735. PubMed ID: 32379535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrograde inspection
    Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of repeat forward-view examination of the right-sided colon during colonoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Kim SY; Lee SJ; Chung JW; Kwon KA; Kim KO; Kim YJ; Kim JH; Park DK
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1746-1752. PubMed ID: 32267568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study.
    Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing adenoma detection rates in the right side of the colon comparing retroflexion with a second forward view: a systematic review.
    Desai M; Bilal M; Hamade N; Gorrepati VS; Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Jegadeesan R; Gupta N; Bhandari P; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):453-459.e3. PubMed ID: 30222971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.
    Köksal AŞ; Kalkan IH; Torun S; Taşkıran I; Öztaş E; Kayaçetin E; Şaşmaz N
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):509-12. PubMed ID: 24078934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yield of repeat forward-view examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.
    Clark BT; Parikh ND; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 26769408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
    Gweon TG; Lee SW; Ji JS; Lee JR; Kim JS; Kim BW; Choi H
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5461-5468. PubMed ID: 31953727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
    Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right-sided adenoma detection with retroflexion versus forward-view colonoscopy.
    Chandran S; Parker F; Vaughan R; Mitchell B; Fanning S; Brown G; Yu J; Efthymiou M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):608-13. PubMed ID: 25440687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Floer M; Tschaikowski L; Schepke M; Kempinski R; Neubauer K; Poniewierka E; Kunsch S; Ameis D; Heinzow HS; Auer A; Schmidt HH; Ellenrieder V; Meister T
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2021 May; 9(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 33349200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
    Cadoni S; Falt P; Rondonotti E; Radaelli F; Fojtik P; Gallittu P; Liggi M; Amato A; Paggi S; Smajstrla V; Urban O; Erriu M; Koo M; Leung FW
    Endoscopy; 2017 May; 49(5):456-467. PubMed ID: 28282689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted detection versus conventional colonoscopy for proximal colonic lesions: a multicenter, randomized, tandem-colonoscopy study.
    Lui TKL; Hang DV; Tsao SKK; Hui CKY; Mak LLY; Ko MKL; Cheung KS; Thian MY; Liang R; Tsui VWM; Yeung CK; Dao LV; Leung WK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Feb; 97(2):325-334.e1. PubMed ID: 36208795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zhao S; Yang X; Wang S; Meng Q; Wang R; Bo L; Chang X; Pan P; Xia T; Yang F; Yao J; Zheng J; Sheng J; Zhao X; Tang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gong A; Chen W; Shen J; Zhu X; Wang S; Yan C; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ma RJ; Wang R; Ma Y; Li Z; Bai Y
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e168-e181. PubMed ID: 33220526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.