These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36521181)

  • 1. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI.
    Tehrani DM; Seto AH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 100(7):1218-1219. PubMed ID: 36521181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive procedural planning using computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; Driessen RS; van Diemen PA; Everaars H; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Sprengers RW; Verouden NJW; Nap A; Opolski MP; Leipsic JA; Danad I; Taylor CA; Knaapen P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 32845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study.
    Morris PD; Ryan D; Morton AC; Lycett R; Lawford PV; Hose DR; Gunn JP
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 6(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 23428006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography.
    Sonck J; Nagumo S; Norgaard BL; Otake H; Ko B; Zhang J; Mizukami T; Maeng M; Andreini D; Takahashi Y; Jensen JM; Ihdayhid A; Heggermont W; Barbato E; Mileva N; Munhoz D; Bartunek J; Updegrove A; Collinsworth A; Penicka M; Van Hoe L; Leipsic J; Koo BK; De Bruyne B; Collet C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jul; 15(7):1242-1255. PubMed ID: 35798401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.
    Rubimbura V; Guillon B; Fournier S; Amabile N; Chi Pan C; Combaret N; Eeckhout E; Kibler M; Silvain J; Wijns W; Schiele F; Muller O; Meneveau N; Adjedj J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(6):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 31763775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Trans-Stent FFR Gradient: What Is its Role in Contemporary PCI?
    Mavromatis K; Sandesara PB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 15(21):2203-2205. PubMed ID: 36357024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio.
    Lee HJ; Mejía-Rentería H; Escaned J; Doh JH; Lee JM; Hwang D; Yuasa S; Choi KH; Jang HJ; Jeon KH; Lee J; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 100(7):1208-1217. PubMed ID: 36321601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual Coronary Intervention: A Treatment Planning Tool Based Upon the Angiogram.
    Gosling RC; Morris PD; Silva Soto DA; Lawford PV; Hose DR; Gunn JP
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 May; 12(5):865-872. PubMed ID: 29550308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "One of These Things Is Not Like the Other": FFR or IVUS to Guide Post-PCI Optimization?
    Collison D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jul; 16(14):1774-1777. PubMed ID: 37354159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced ischemic myocardium and improved outcomes.
    Sawant AC; Bhardwaj A; Banerjee K; Jobanputra Y; Kumar A; Parikh P; Kandregula KC; Poddar K; Ellis SG; Nair R; Corbelli J; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):692-700. PubMed ID: 29405553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Improvement in Fractional Flow Reserve With Outcomes, Including Symptomatic Relief, After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Fournier S; Ciccarelli G; Toth GG; Milkas A; Xaplanteris P; Tonino PAL; Fearon WF; Pijls NHJ; Barbato E; De Bruyne B
    JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 4(4):370-374. PubMed ID: 30840026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic Value of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the FAME 3 Trial.
    Piroth Z; Otsuki H; Zimmermann FM; Ferenci T; Keulards DCJ; Yeung AC; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 15(11):884-891. PubMed ID: 36121706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of Postintervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Improve Procedural and Clinical Outcomes.
    Hakeem A; Uretsky BF
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 30689413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    van Bommel RJ; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Lemmert ME; van Zandvoort L; Wilschut J; Zijlstra F; de Jaegere P; Daemen J; van Mieghem NM
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(5):e007428. PubMed ID: 31018666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic Implications of Post-Intervention Resting Pd/Pa and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation.
    Shin D; Lee SH; Lee JM; Choi KH; Hwang D; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim HK; Kwak JJ; Ha SJ; Song YB; Shin ES; Doh JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 13(16):1920-1933. PubMed ID: 32819481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic Impact of Residual Anatomic Disease Burden After Functionally Complete Revascularization.
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Choi KH; Lee HJ; Song YB; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hahn JY; Shin ES; Doh JH; Hoshino M; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Li X; Ge Z; Chen SL; Kakuta T; Koo BK
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009232. PubMed ID: 32895005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and Prognostic Impact From Objective Analysis of Post-Angioplasty Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback.
    Lee SH; Kim J; Lefieux A; Molony D; Shin D; Hwang D; Choi KH; Chang HS; Jeon KH; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim HK; Ha SJ; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Doh JH; Shin ES; Nam CW; Koo BK; Gwon HC; Lee JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Sep; 14(17):1888-1900. PubMed ID: 34503739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated Algorithm Using Pre-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback Curve to Predict Post-Intervention Physiological Results.
    Lee SH; Shin D; Lee JM; Lefieux A; Molony D; Choi KH; Hwang D; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim HK; Ha SJ; Kwak JJ; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Hahn JY; Doh JH; Shin ES; Nam CW; Koo BK; Choi SH; Gwon HC
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(22):2670-2684. PubMed ID: 33069650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.