BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36521760)

  • 1. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review.
    Bamps S; Raymaekers V; Roosen G; Put E; Vanvolsem S; Achahbar SE; Meeuws S; Wissels M; Plazier M
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Mar; 171():10-18. PubMed ID: 36521760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.
    Campbell PG; Nunley PD; Cavanaugh D; Kerr E; Utter PA; Frank K; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E6. PubMed ID: 29290128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of serum markers for muscle damage, surgical blood loss, postoperative recovery, and surgical site pain after extreme lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws or traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ohba T; Ebata S; Haro H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):415. PubMed ID: 29037186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF): Comparative Effectiveness and Safety versus PLIF/TLIF and Predictive Factors Affecting LLIF Outcome.
    Barbagallo GM; Albanese V; Raich AL; Dettori JR; Sherry N; Balsano M
    Evid Based Spine Care J; 2014 Apr; 5(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24715870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) reduces total lifetime cost compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a cost-utility analysis in Thailand.
    Boonsirikamchai W; Phisalpapra P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 36797750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
    Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion for degenerative low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
    Goyal A; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Goncalves S; Bydon M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 167():122-128. PubMed ID: 29476935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
    Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different lumbar fusion techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Li W; Wei H; Zhang R
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):345. PubMed ID: 37968633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.
    Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):582. PubMed ID: 31801508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Tricalcium Phosphate and Iliac Bone Graft Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Thailand.
    Tirawanish P; Phisalprapa P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    Int J Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Tanaka S; Ouchida J; Segi N; Kobayashi K; Ando K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Sep; 45(18):E1172-E1178. PubMed ID: 32341307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.