133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36522257)
1. External Validation of the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator and Comparison with Stockholm3 for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in a Swedish Population-based Screening Cohort.
Palsdottir T; Grönberg H; Hilmisson A; Eklund M; Nordström T; Vigneswaran HT
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 May; 9(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 36522257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External Validation of the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group Risk Calculator and the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Swedish Population-based Screening Cohort.
Chandra Engel J; Palsdottir T; Ankerst D; Remmers S; Mortezavi A; Chellappa V; Egevad L; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jul; 41():1-7. PubMed ID: 35813248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
Björnebo L; Discacciati A; Falagario U; Vigneswaran HT; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Lantz A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e247131. PubMed ID: 38648061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing unnecessary biopsies while detecting clinically significant prostate cancer including cribriform growth with the ERSPC Rotterdam risk calculator and 4Kscore.
Verbeek JFM; Bangma CH; Kweldam CF; van der Kwast TH; Kümmerlin IP; van Leenders GJLH; Roobol MJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 30528698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of the Stockholm3 Test and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Study.
Hao S; Heintz E; Östensson E; Discacciati A; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Clements MS
Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 35094896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Unified Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction Model Combining the Stockholm3 Test and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Palsdottir T; Nordström T; Aly M; Jäderling F; Clements M; Grönberg H; Eklund M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):490-496. PubMed ID: 31412016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Risk Calculators to Predict Prostate Cancer Risk.
Patel HD; Remmers S; Ellis JL; Li EV; Roobol MJ; Fang AM; Davik P; Rais-Bahrami S; Murphy AB; Ross AE; Gupta GN
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Mar; 7(3):e241516. PubMed ID: 38451522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort.
Hagens MJ; Stelwagen PJ; Veerman H; Rynja SP; Smeenge M; van der Noort V; Roeleveld TA; van Kesteren J; Remmers S; Roobol MJ; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 36245015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Head-to-head Comparison of Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Strategies Using the Stockholm3 Test, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Swedish National Guidelines: Results from a Prospective Population-based Screening Study.
Waldén M; Aldrimer M; Lagerlöf JH; Eklund M; Grönberg H; Nordström T; Palsdottir T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 38():32-39. PubMed ID: 35495282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating PHI in decision making: external validation of the Rotterdam risk calculators for detection of prostate cancer.
Rius Bilbao L; Aguirre Larracoechea U; Valladares Gomez C; Remmers S; Mar Medina C;
World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):141. PubMed ID: 38478041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying Prostate Cancer Among Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
Nordström T; Engel JC; Bergman M; Egevad L; Aly M; Eklund M; Palsdottir T; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Feb; 24():11-16. PubMed ID: 34337490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomarker discrimination and calibration with MRI-targeted biopsies: an analysis with the Stockholm3 test.
Vigneswaran HT; Palsdottir T; Olsson H; Haug ES; Picker W; Löffeler S; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):457-464. PubMed ID: 33168965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grönberg H; Eklund M; Picker W; Aly M; Jäderling F; Adolfsson J; Landquist M; Haug ES; Ström P; Carlsson S; Nordström T
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30001824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing Biopsies and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans During the Diagnostic Pathway of Prostate Cancer: Applying the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator to the PRECISION Trial Data.
Remmers S; Kasivisvanathan V; Verbeek JFM; Moore CM; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Feb; 36():1-8. PubMed ID: 35098168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of replacing PSA with Stockholm3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in a healthcare system - the Stavanger experience.
Viste E; Vinje CA; Lid TG; Skeie S; Evjen-Olsen Ø; Nordström T; Thorsen O; Gilje B; Janssen EAM; Kjosavik SR
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Sep; 38(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 32772613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate cancer risk calculators and decision strategies in two large European medical centres.
Davik P; Remmers S; Elschot M; Roobol MJ; Bathen TF; Bertilsson H
BJU Int; 2024 Mar; 133(3):278-288. PubMed ID: 37607322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Capio Prostate Cancer Center Model for Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Real-world Evidence from 2018 to 2022.
Palsdottir T; Söderbäck H; Jäderling F; Bergman M; Vigneswaran H; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2024 Mar; 61():29-36. PubMed ID: 38384438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
