These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36523725)
1. Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of the Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents in Primary Molars. Choudhary K; Gouraha A; Sharma M; Sharma P; Tiwari M; Chouksey A Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31422. PubMed ID: 36523725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of Carisolv and Polymer Bur for Selective Caries Removal in Primary Molars. Asal MA; Abdellatif AM; Hammouda HE Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 34720507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Hosein T; Hasan A J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 18474155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Splieth C; Rosin M; Gellissen B Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 11800438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):507-16. PubMed ID: 25516887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. Yazici AR; Atílla P; Ozgünaltay G; Müftüoglu S J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1177-82. PubMed ID: 14641660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Permeability evaluation after decay removal in primary teeth with current caries-excavation techniques. Shabzendedar M; Moosavi H; Talbi M; Sharifi M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 22269234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal. Prabhakar A; Kiran NK J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):26-34. PubMed ID: 19575051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Polymer Bur, Stainless Steel Bur, Carisolv, Papacarie - An Invitro Comparative Study. Divya G; Prasad MG; Vasa AA; Vasanthi D; Ramanarayana B; Mynampati P J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Jul; 9(7):ZC42-6. PubMed ID: 26393204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study. Boob AR; Manjula M; Reddy ER; Srilaxmi N; Rani T Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Jan; 7(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 25206231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric analysis after caries excavation with caries detecting dyes and chemomechanical caries removal agents using 3D scanner-a randomised clinical trial. Bastia R; Govind S; Assiry AA; Alessa NA; Kader MA; Adil AH; Karobari MI BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):164. PubMed ID: 38302932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study. Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An Anwar AS; Kumar RK; Prasad Rao VA; Reddy NV; Reshma VJ J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2017 Nov; 9(Suppl 1):S166-S172. PubMed ID: 29284958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of 2 chemomechanical caries removal methods on residual bacteria in dentin of primary teeth. El-Tekeya M; El-Habashy L; Mokhles N; El-Kimary E Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 23014090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal. Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of antimicrobial property of two commercially available chemomechanical caries removal agents (Carisolv and Papacarie): An ex vivo study. Reddy MV; Shankar AJ; Pentakota VG; Kolli H; Ganta H; Katari PK J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2015; 5(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26236677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Chaussain-Miller C; Decup F; Domejean-Orliaguet S; Gillet D; Guigand M; Kaleka R; Laboux O; Lafont J; Medioni E; Serfaty R; Toumelin-Chemla F; Tubiana J; Lasfargues JJ Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Mar; 7(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12673435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora. Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]