179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36524297)
1. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler perfusion imaging for tissue perfusion measurement.
Guven G; Dijkstra A; Kuijper TM; Trommel N; van Baar ME; Topeli A; Ince C; van der Vlies CH
Microcirculation; 2023 Jan; 30(1):e12795. PubMed ID: 36524297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of vulvar blood perfusion in women with provoked vestibulodynia using laser Doppler perfusion imaging and laser speckle imaging.
Cyr MP; Pinard A; Dubois O; Morin M
Microvasc Res; 2019 Jan; 121():1-6. PubMed ID: 30121222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function.
Tew GA; Klonizakis M; Crank H; Briers JD; Hodges GJ
Microvasc Res; 2011 Nov; 82(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 21803051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler imaging to assess skin blood flow in humans.
Millet C; Roustit M; Blaise S; Cracowski JL
Microvasc Res; 2011 Sep; 82(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 21745482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations.
Iredahl F; Löfberg A; Sjöberg F; Farnebo S; Tesselaar E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133760. PubMed ID: 26270037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laser speckle contrast imaging, the future DBF imaging technique for TRP target engagement biomarker assays.
Bamps D; Macours L; Buntinx L; de Hoon J
Microvasc Res; 2020 May; 129():103965. PubMed ID: 31812705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological concerns with laser speckle contrast imaging in clinical evaluation of microcirculation.
Zötterman J; Mirdell R; Horsten S; Farnebo S; Tesselaar E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174703. PubMed ID: 28358906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vessel packaging effect in laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler imaging.
Fredriksson I; Larsson M
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Oct; 22(10):1-7. PubMed ID: 29019179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood perfusion values of laser speckle contrast imaging and laser Doppler flowmetry: is a direct comparison possible?
Binzoni T; Humeau-Heurtier A; Abraham P; Mahe G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 May; 60(5):1259-65. PubMed ID: 23232361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring of partial and full venous outflow obstruction in a porcine flap model using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Zötterman J; Bergkvist M; Iredahl F; Tesselaar E; Farnebo S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Jul; 69(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 27026039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of infrared thermography and laser speckle contrast imaging for the dynamic assessment of digital microvascular function.
Pauling JD; Shipley JA; Raper S; Watson ML; Ward SG; Harris ND; McHugh NJ
Microvasc Res; 2012 Mar; 83(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 21763703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser speckle contrast imaging for assessment of liver microcirculation.
Sturesson C; Milstein DM; Post IC; Maas AM; van Gulik TM
Microvasc Res; 2013 May; 87():34-40. PubMed ID: 23403398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and normalization of reactive hyperemia using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Shirazi BR; Valentine RJ; Lang JA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244795. PubMed ID: 33412561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microvascular blood flow monitoring with laser speckle contrast imaging using the generalized differences algorithm.
Humeau-Heurtier A; Mahé G; Abraham P
Microvasc Res; 2015 Mar; 98():54-61. PubMed ID: 25576743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of non-invasive assessment of skin endothelial function using laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging.
Puissant C; Abraham P; Durand S; Humeau-Heurtier A; Faure S; Lefthériotis G; Rousseau P; Mahé G
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61320. PubMed ID: 23620742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of pediatric scald wounds.
Mirdell R; Farnebo S; Sjöberg F; Tesselaar E
Burns; 2018 Feb; 44(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28797578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning of speckle statistics for in vivo and noninvasive characterization of cutaneous wound regions using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Basak K; Dey G; Mahadevappa M; Mandal M; Sheet D; Dutta PK
Microvasc Res; 2016 Sep; 107():6-16. PubMed ID: 27131831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of Dynamic optical coherence tomography for non-invasive, in vivo microcirculation imaging of the skin.
Themstrup L; Welzel J; Ciardo S; Kaestle R; Ulrich M; Holmes J; Whitehead R; Sattler EC; Kindermann N; Pellacani G; Jemec GB
Microvasc Res; 2016 Sep; 107():97-105. PubMed ID: 27235002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry.
Fredriksson I; Hultman M; Strömberg T; Larsson M
J Biomed Opt; 2019 Jan; 24(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30675771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging and laser-Doppler fluxmetry in boys and men.
Hodges GJ; Klentrou P; Cheung SS; Falk B
Microvasc Res; 2020 Mar; 128():103927. PubMed ID: 31593712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
