151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36524547)
1. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on Bell's palsy.
Raja H; Fitzpatrick N
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Oct; 137(10):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 36524547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Raja H; Almansoor ZR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on anosmia.
Raja H; Lodhi S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 37051757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How readable and reliable is online patient information on chronic rhinosinusitis?
Habeeb A
J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jul; 135(7):644-647. PubMed ID: 34154676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.
Grose EM; Kim JH; Philteos J; Levin M; Lee JW; Monteiro EA
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 9(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 37006742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.
Grose EM; Holmes CP; Aravinthan KA; Wu V; Lee JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 50(1):16. PubMed ID: 33731227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction.
Reddy RV; Golan R; Loloi J; Diaz P; Saltzman RG; Watane A; Ramasamy R
Andrologia; 2022 Dec; 54(11):e14607. PubMed ID: 36240784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Otosclerosis online: a critical analysis of quality, reliability, readability and content of otosclerosis information.
La Rosa A; Ayache D; Altaisan R; Daval M; Gargula S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):503-508. PubMed ID: 37910206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
