These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36525003)

  • 1. Investigation of factors influencing submarining mitigation with child booster seats.
    Forman J; Miller M; Perez-Rapela D; Gepner B; Edwards MA; Jermakian JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 36525003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt positioning booster seats.
    Reed MP; Ebert-Hamilton SM; Klinich KD; Manary MA; Rupp JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():512-22. PubMed ID: 22703990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive modeling of submarining risk in car occupants based on pelvis angle and lap belt positioning.
    Takeuchi Y; Tanaka Y; Azuma T; Zhao Y; Mizuno K; Yamada M; Yokoyama Y; Yamada Y; Jinzaki M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):147-155. PubMed ID: 38019483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Child Posture and Belt Fit in a Range of Booster Configurations.
    Jones MLH; Ebert S; Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32012975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of naturalistic seating postures and seatbelt routing on booster-seated Q6 ATD kinematics and kinetics in frontal impacts.
    Maheshwari J; Griffith M; Baker G; Patton D; Mansfield J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107140. PubMed ID: 37263046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Belt fit for children in vehicle seats with and without belt-positioning boosters.
    West BA; Reed MP; Benedick A; De Leonardis D; Huey R; Sauber-Schatz E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):488-493. PubMed ID: 36026460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of seated postures and anthropometry on lap belt fit in vehicle occupants: A 3D computed tomography study.
    Tanaka Y; Shu H; Zhao Y; Mizuno K; Yamada M; Yokoyama Y; Yamada Y; Jinzaki M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):454-462. PubMed ID: 38478461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Submarining sensitivity across varied anthropometry in an autonomous driving system environment.
    Rawska K; Gepner B; Kulkarni S; Chastain K; Zhu J; Richardson R; Perez-Rapela D; Forman J; Kerrigan JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S123-S127. PubMed ID: 31539280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of restraint parameters using PIPER 6y in reclined seating during frontal impact.
    Bohman K; El-Mobader S; Jakobsson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S123-S129. PubMed ID: 36214799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes.
    Durbin DR; Elliott MR; Winston FK
    JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(21):2835-40. PubMed ID: 12783914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of 6YO pediatric human body model kinematics and kinetics to determine submarining across naturalistic seating postures.
    Slusher G; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A; Maheshwari J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S111-S116. PubMed ID: 35862895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts.
    Bohman K; Östh J; Jakobsson L; Stockman I; Wimmerstedt M; Wallin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S25-S30. PubMed ID: 32816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Submarining sensitivity across varied seat configurations in autonomous driving system environment.
    Rawska K; Gepner B; Moreau D; Kerrigan JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S1-S6. PubMed ID: 32658549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a moderately reclined seat-back angle on the kinematics of the Large-Omnidirectional Child Anthropomorphic Test Device with and without a belt-positioning booster in frontal crashes.
    Graci V; Hauschild H; Maheshwari J; Humm J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S117-S122. PubMed ID: 35863014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head excursion in frontal impacts is lower in high back booster seats than in forward facing child seats with internal harnesses designed for children up to 8 years of age.
    Bilston LE; Mills E; Kent N; Brown J; Whyte T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):244-249. PubMed ID: 35333678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts - with and without automatic emergency braking.
    Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 33095067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of vehicle and restraint design changes for mitigating rear seat occupant injuries.
    Beck B; Brown J; Bilston LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):711-9. PubMed ID: 24279923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geometry of rear seats and child restraints compared to child anthropometry.
    Bilston LE; Sagar N
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2007 Oct; 51():275-98. PubMed ID: 18278601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of LATCH vs. non-LATCH installations for boosters in frontal impacts.
    Mansfield JA; Baker GH; Ramachandra R; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S93-S98. PubMed ID: 34379543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in booster seat use among young children in crashes.
    Durbin DR; Kallan MJ; Winston FK
    Pediatrics; 2001 Dec; 108(6):E109. PubMed ID: 11731636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.