These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3652589)

  • 1. Optimum pore size for bone cement fixation.
    Cook SD; Thongpreda N; Anderson RC; Thomas KA; Haddad RJ; Griffin CD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Oct; (223):296-302. PubMed ID: 3652589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of post-sintering heat treatments on the fatigue properties of porous coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
    Cook SD; Thongpreda N; Anderson RC; Haddad RJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Apr; 22(4):287-302. PubMed ID: 3372550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue properties of carbon- and porous-coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
    Cook SD; Georgette FS; Skinner HB; Haddad RJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984; 18(5):497-512. PubMed ID: 6736080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants.
    Clemow AJ; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Koeneman J; Anderson J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 7348706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (150):263-70. PubMed ID: 7428231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interface mechanics and bone growth into porous Co-Cr-Mo alloy implants.
    Cook SD; Walsh KA; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Mar; (193):271-80. PubMed ID: 3971631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fatigue strength of porous-coated Ti-6%Al-4%V implant alloy.
    Yue S; Pilliar RM; Weatherly GC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984; 18(9):1043-58. PubMed ID: 6544792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A parametric study of the factors affecting the fatigue strength of porous coated Ti-6A1-4V implant alloy.
    Kohn DH; Ducheyne P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Nov; 24(11):1483-501. PubMed ID: 2279982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of hydroxyapatite-coated and alumina-coated metal implants.
    Inadome T; Hayashi K; Nakashima Y; Tsumura H; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming.
    Hollander DA; von Walter M; Wirtz T; Sellei R; Schmidt-Rohlfing B; Paar O; Erli HJ
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):955-63. PubMed ID: 16115681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel production method and in-vitro cell compatibility of porous Ti-6Al-4V alloy disk for hard tissue engineering.
    Bhattarai SR; Khalil KA; Dewidar M; Hwang PH; Yi HK; Kim HY
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Aug; 86(2):289-99. PubMed ID: 17957720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An initial study of diffusion bonds between superplastic Ti-6Al-4V for implant dentistry applications.
    Elias KL; Daehn GS; Brantley WA; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):357-65. PubMed ID: 17618918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical properties of cast Ti-6Al-4V-XCu alloys.
    Aoki T; Okafor IC; Watanabe I; Hattori M; Oda Y; Okabe T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 15525390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 15008237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation.
    Ahmed AM; Raab S; Miller JE
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 6491806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals.
    Fonseca RG; de Almeida JG; Haneda IG; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19328279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microstructure and mechanical properties of plasma sprayed HA/YSZ/Ti-6Al-4V composite coatings.
    Khor KA; Gu YW; Pan D; Cheang P
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4009-17. PubMed ID: 15046891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain.
    Akova T; Ucar Y; Tukay A; Balkaya MC; Brantley WA
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1400-4. PubMed ID: 18417202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.