These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36526224)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.
    Monk SH; Rossi VJ; Atkins TG; Karimian B; Pfortmiller D; Kim PK; Adamson TE; Smith MD; McGirt MJ; Holland CM; Deshmukh VR; Branch BC
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Mar; 171():e471-e477. PubMed ID: 36526224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Tailored for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.
    Feng C; Zhang Y; Chong F; Yang M; Liu C; Liu L; Huang C; Huang C; Feng X; Wang X; Chu T; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e317-e323. PubMed ID: 31132490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.
    Porche K; Samra R; Melnick K; Brennan M; Vaziri S; Seubert C; Polifka A; Hoh DJ; Mohamed B
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 34687905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption.
    Kerolus MG; Yerneni K; Witiw CD; Shelton A; Canar WJ; Daily D; Fontes RBV; Deutsch H; Fessler RG; Buvanendran A; O'Toole JE
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Feb; 88(3):648-657. PubMed ID: 33469652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yang Y; Wu X; Wu W; Liu Z; Pang M; Chen Y; Ou Z; Rong L
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():106003. PubMed ID: 32559705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting.
    Parrish JM; Jenkins NW; Brundage TS; Hrynewycz NM; Podnar J; Buvanendran A; Singh K
    Int J Spine Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):970-981. PubMed ID: 33560257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ge M; Zhang Y; Ying H; Feng C; Li Y; Tian J; Zhao T; Shao H; Huang Y
    Int Orthop; 2022 Sep; 46(9):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 35723702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Heo DH; Jang JW; Park CK
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2853-2862. PubMed ID: 37211555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: 5-year experience with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.
    Staartjes VE; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E7. PubMed ID: 30933924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
    Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery.
    Heo DH; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E18. PubMed ID: 30933919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study.
    Xu H; Yu L; Xiao B; Zhao H; Gu X; Gao Z; Wang W
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e98-e108. PubMed ID: 38008170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.