These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36526467)

  • 21. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
    Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of tooth preparation burs on the roughness and bond strength of adhesives to human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; Saif RE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 21874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multivariate evaluation of the cutting performance of rotary instruments with electric and air-turbine handpieces.
    Funkenbusch PD; Rotella M; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):558-563. PubMed ID: 27157601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validating cleanability of dental rotary diamond instruments soiled with 2 clinically relevant dental test soil components.
    Gopal P; Claussen E; Azzolin K; Megremis S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2022 Mar; 153(3):221-232.e1. PubMed ID: 35000746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs.
    Al-Omari WM; Mitchell CA; Cunningham JL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 11422697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Designed experiment evaluation of key variables affecting the cutting performance of rotary instruments.
    Funkenbusch PD; Rotella M; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 25682529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs.
    Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Greene TD; Moss ME; Lee HJ; Ben-Hanan U; Graser GN; Barzilay I
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15032891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alteration of the intaglio surface of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.
    Gorman CM; de Faoite D; Flannery D; Ratajczak M; Kelly T; Stanton KT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):411.e1-411.e10. PubMed ID: 31547955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics.
    Kursoglu P; Karagoz Motro PF; Kazazoglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 24484857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of endodontic irrigants on surface roughness of various nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Hamdy TM; Alkabani YM; Ismail AG; Galal MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):517. PubMed ID: 37488612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of bur type on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin.
    Dias WR; Pereira PN; Swift EJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 15536849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols.
    Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
    Atlas AM; Janyavula S; Elsabee R; Alper E; Isleem WF; Bergler M; Setzer FC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35643825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of different surface and heat treatments on the surface roughness, crystallography, and phase composition of high translucency zirconia for monolithic restorations.
    Hammoudeh H; Carracho L; Beard C; Razzoog M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):164.e1-164.e11. PubMed ID: 37945513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Smear layer and debris removal using manual Ni-Ti files compared with rotary Protaper Ni- Ti files - An In-Vitro SEM study.
    Reddy JM; Latha P; Gowda B; Manvikar V; Vijayalaxmi DB; Ponangi KC
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24653610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the dentin surface.
    Sekimoto T; Derkson GD; Richardson AS
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 10530274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root canal centering ability of rotary cutting nickel titanium instruments: A meta-analysis.
    Gundappa M; Bansal R; Khoriya S; Mohan R
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 25506134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.