These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36526840)

  • 1. Primary pulpotomies - what should we be using?
    Conway F
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):150-151. PubMed ID: 36526840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Glenny AM; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 May; 5(5):CD003220. PubMed ID: 29852056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of Biodentine versus formocresol in pulpotomy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jasani B; Musale P; Jasani B
    Quintessence Int; 2022 Aug; 53(8):698-705. PubMed ID: 35976738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biodentine
    El Meligy OAES; Alamoudi NM; Allazzam SM; El-Housseiny AAM
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30612569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.
    Innes NP; Ricketts D; Chong LY; Keightley AJ; Lamont T; Santamaria RM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD005512. PubMed ID: 26718872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial.
    El Meligy OA; Allazzam S; Alamoudi NM
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 27175451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic comparison of Biodentine and Formocresol: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
    Firoozi P; Salman BN; Aslaminabadi N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(6):855-867. PubMed ID: 35596042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Lin PY; Chen HS; Wang YH; Tu YK
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1060-77. PubMed ID: 24513112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
    Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth.
    Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the success rate of a bioactive dentin substitute with those of other root restoration materials in pulpotomy of primary teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shafaee H; Alirezaie M; Rangrazi A; Bardideh E
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2019 Aug; 150(8):676-688. PubMed ID: 31202439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Peng L; Ye L; Guo X; Tan H; Zhou X; Wang C; Li R
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):751-7. PubMed ID: 17714467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
    Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical observation and histopathological evaluation of pulp after pulpotomy of primary teeth with formocresol and biodentine.
    Guang J; Li J; Hao L
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2022 May; 68(5):83-88. PubMed ID: 36029512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate of Formocresol-based Pulpotomy versus Collagen-based Pulpotomy: An
    Anandan V; Inbanathan J; Saket P; Krishnamoorthy V; Gandhi S; Chandrababu VK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):680-685. PubMed ID: 34393127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Primary Molar Pulpotomies-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Veettil SK; Jinatongthai P; Gutmann JL
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 19(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 30926099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No clear evidence of superiority regarding pulp medicaments in primary molars.
    Elkhadem A; Sami I
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):100-1. PubMed ID: 25522937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and radiographic success of mineral trioxide aggregate compared with formocresol as a pulpotomy treatment in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Marghalani AA; Omar S; Chen JW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Jul; 145(7):714-21. PubMed ID: 24982277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.