BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36527731)

  • 1. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Romeo D; Ercoli C; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):761-765. PubMed ID: 35871300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with Double Digital Scanning: Accuracy of Fit Assessment.
    Papaspyridakos P; AlFulaij F; Bokhary A; Sallustio A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 35176178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
    Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication.
    Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian A; Kudara Y; Ntovas P; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 36779654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
    Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Workflow With a Triple Scanning Technique for Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.
    Papaspyridakos P; Mariano A; De Souza A; Kotina E; Kudara Y; Kang K
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33001661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel complete-arch pillar system (CAPS) to register implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit.
    Nuytens P; Grande F; D'haese R; Salameh Z; Lepidi L
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104885. PubMed ID: 38346663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body.
    Ntovas P; Spanopoulou M; Martin W; Sykaras N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):475-480. PubMed ID: 36244761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings.
    Conejo J; Yoo TH; Atria PJ; Fraiman H; Blatz MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):475.e1-475.e7. PubMed ID: 38182453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study.
    Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.