151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36528269)
1. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: Letter in reply to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
Khanna R; Khanna R; Larson AR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e287-e288. PubMed ID: 36528269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: A letter in reply to the Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology.
Wong NS; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e285. PubMed ID: 36427664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Teratogenic, unregulated, vitamin A acne supplements, and Roe v Wade: Response to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
Zamil DH; Wang LK; Paidisetty PS; Asad U; Ren V
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e289. PubMed ID: 36780948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology.
Yousif J; Adlam T; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 87(5):1225-1226. PubMed ID: 35868572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK.
Graham S
BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The fall of Roe
Lewandowska M
BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
Holman EJ
JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?
Räsänen J; Gothreau C; Lippert-Rasmussen K
J Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 48(12):952-956. PubMed ID: 36180204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
Chopko ME
Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The
Fleck LM
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):310-322. PubMed ID: 36683585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global implications of overturning Roe
Singh S; Sedgh G
BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o2025. PubMed ID: 35981723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. US Supreme Court ends constitutional right to abortion.
Tanne JH
BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1575. PubMed ID: 35760421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
