These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36528269)
21. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Seeking vasectomy in post-Dobbs America: the male counterpart response to the reversal of Roe v Wade as evidenced by Google search trends. Sax MR Fertil Steril; 2022 Dec; 118(6):1189. PubMed ID: 36369185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care. Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One Year After Dobbs-Vast Changes to the Abortion Legal Landscape. Gostin LO; Wetter S; Reingold RB JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Aug; 4(8):e233091. PubMed ID: 37535348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion. Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Unborn in the USA: what happened and what's next for Roe Silberner J BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1184. PubMed ID: 35580891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being. Berg JA; Woods NF Womens Midlife Health; 2023 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36609311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The US Supreme Court Dobbs decision's impact on the future plans of 2023 residency graduates at the University of Utah. Woodcock A; Carter G; Baayd J; Turok DK Contraception; 2024 Feb; 130():110328. PubMed ID: 37977429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation. Pagoto SL; Palmer L; Horwitz-Willis N J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e42582. PubMed ID: 37140975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Kulczycki A Health Educ Behav; 2022 Dec; 49(6):924-928. PubMed ID: 36173003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory. Conkle DO Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The fall of Roe v Wade: a call to action for religious medical providers. Shahawy S; Rattani A Lancet; 2022 Jul; 400(10346):93. PubMed ID: 35779557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Forecasting the mental health harms of overturning Roe v Wade. Biggs MA; Rocca C BMJ; 2022 Jul; 378():o1890. PubMed ID: 35902111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]