These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36528481)
1. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional modeling of orthodontic dental casts using smartphone-based photogrammetric technology. Al-Rudainy D; Adel Al-Lami H; Yang L J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Feb; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 36528481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of photogrammetry software programs and conventional impression techniques for the fabrication of nasal maxillofacial prostheses. Buzayan MM; Elkezza AH; Ahmad SF; Mohd Salleh N; Sivakumar I J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37748996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Create virtual dentoskeletal model by superimposing digital dental cast into cone-beam computed tomography scan. Mahmood RS; Hamandi SJA; Al-Mahdi AH Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Sep; 19(9):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 38600410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts. Fu X; Peng C; Li Z; Liu S; Tan M; Song J PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178858. PubMed ID: 28640827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses. Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records. Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods. Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software. Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical assessment of the potential for Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry to produce high fidelity 3D dental models. Silvester CM; Hillson S Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Oct; 173(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 32748988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults]. Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A virtual analysis of the precision and accuracy of 3-dimensional ear casts generated from smartphone camera images. Farook TH; Rashid F; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Dudley J; Khursheed Alam M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):830-836. PubMed ID: 33642077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans. Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors. Hernandez A; Lemaire E Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing. de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two stereophotogrametry software for 3D reconstruction of virtual facial models. Chaves LB; Barbosa TL; Casagrande CPM; Alencar DS; Capelli J; Carvalho FAR Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(3):e2220230. PubMed ID: 35792785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between stone and digital cast measurements in mixed dentition : Validity, reliability, reproducibility, and objectivity. Schieffer L; Latzko L; Ulmer H; Schenz-Spisic N; Lepperdinger U; Paulus M; Crismani AG J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):75-84. PubMed ID: 35238945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Method for Economical Smartphone-Based Clinical 3D Facial Scanning. Nightingale RC; Ross MT; Allenby MC; Woodruff MA; Powell SK J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):818-825. PubMed ID: 33089546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity. Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique. Omari R; Hunt C; Coumbaros J; Chapman B Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):939-950. PubMed ID: 33244707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]