These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36528773)

  • 21. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving effect of microendoscopic decompression surgery on low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and predictive factors of postoperative residual low back pain: a single-center retrospective study.
    Taiji R; Iwasaki H; Hashizume H; Yukawa Y; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Tsutsui S; Takami M; Nagata K; Murata S; Kozaki T; Yoshida M; Yamada H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):954. PubMed ID: 34781941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MRI grading of spinal stenosis is not associated with the severity of low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Matsuo S; Enyo Y; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Nakatani T; Sakon N; Nagata W; Nakagawa Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):857. PubMed ID: 36096768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study.
    Cushnie D; Thomas K; Jacobs WB; Cho RKH; Soroceanu A; Ahn H; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Fisher CG; Glennie RA; Hall H; Jarzem P; Johnson MG; Manson NA; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Rampersaud YR; Phan P; Casha S
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 31121258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusions.
    Früh A; Leißa P; Tkatschenko D; Truckenmüller P; Wessels L; Vajkoczy P; Bayerl S
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 36194374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Residual leg numbness after endoscopic discectomy treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
    Yan D; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):273. PubMed ID: 32340609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Percutaneous transforaminal full endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Xie P; Feng F; Chen Z; He L; Yang B; Chen R; Wu W; Liu B; Dong J; Shu T; Zhang L; Chen CM; Rong L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):546. PubMed ID: 32799839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hara N; Oka H; Yamazaki T; Takeshita K; Murakami M; Hoshi K; Terayama S; Seichi A; Nakamura K; Kawaguchi H; Matsudaira K
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1849-54. PubMed ID: 20309711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study.
    Takenaka H; Sugiura H; Kamiya M; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Kawamura M; Hanamura S; Hanamura H
    Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1824-1831. PubMed ID: 31302266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients with Predominant Back or Predominant Leg Pain.
    Stienen MN; Joswig H; Smoll NR; Corniola MV; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 93():458-465.e1. PubMed ID: 27389938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How fast pain, numbness, and paresthesia resolves after lumbar nerve root decompression: a retrospective study of patient's self-reported computerized pain drawing.
    Huang P; Sengupta DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E529-36. PubMed ID: 24480941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Aihara T; Endo K; Suzuki H; Kojima A; Sawaji Y; Urushibara M; Matsuoka Y; Takamatsu T; Murata K; Konishi T; Yamauchi H; Endo H; Yamamoto K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1219-e1225. PubMed ID: 33271376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usefulness of the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) for Predicting Poor Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
    Watanabe K; Otani K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Kobayashi H; Handa J; Yabuki S; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI
    Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():2589865. PubMed ID: 34970359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Nakarai H; Kato S; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 34699996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes including preoperative total knee replacement and knee osteoarthritis status in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ho Lee B; Kim TH; Chong HS; Lee SH; Park JO; Kim HS; Shim DW; Lee HM; Moon SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Mar; 28(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 23563328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.