These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36528903)

  • 1. Estimation and statistical analysis of model parameters using sequential Monte Carlo for phenol and p-cresol separation.
    Yuan Z; Yamamoto Y; Yajima T; Kawajiri Y
    J Chromatogr A; 2023 Jan; 1688():463703. PubMed ID: 36528903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks.
    Mariño IP; Zaikin A; Míguez J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182015. PubMed ID: 28797087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Annealed Sequential Monte Carlo Method for Bayesian Phylogenetics.
    Wang L; Wang S; Bouchard-Côté A
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):155-183. PubMed ID: 31173141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The metabolic network of Clostridium acetobutylicum: Comparison of the approximate Bayesian computation via sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) and profile likelihood estimation (PLE) methods for determinability analysis.
    Thorn GJ; King JR
    Math Biosci; 2016 Jan; 271():62-79. PubMed ID: 26561777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian deep learning-based
    Lee HH; Kim H
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jul; 88(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 35344604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal sequential Bayesian analysis for degradation tests.
    Rodríguez-Narciso S; Christen JA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Jul; 22(3):405-28. PubMed ID: 26307336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perturbation Monte Carlo Method for Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography.
    Leino AA; Lunttila T; Mozumder M; Pulkkinen A; Tarvainen T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Oct; 39(10):2985-2995. PubMed ID: 32217473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Metropolis Monte Carlo implementation of bayesian time-domain parameter estimation: application to coupling constant estimation from antiphase multiplets.
    Andrec M; Prestegard JH
    J Magn Reson; 1998 Feb; 130(2):217-32. PubMed ID: 9500892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Monte Carlo and maximum likelihood approach for uncertainty estimation and risk management: Application to lake oxygen recovery model.
    Chaudhary A; Hantush MM
    Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():301-311. PubMed ID: 27836170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.
    Fang W; Wang Z; Giles MB; Jackson CH; Welton NJ; Andrieu C; Thom H
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 34231446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stochastic regression approach to analyzing thermodynamic uncertainty in chemical speciation modeling.
    Weber CL; Vanbriesen JM; Small MS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3872-8. PubMed ID: 16830555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
    Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing Monte Carlo error in the Bayesian estimation of risk ratios using log-binomial regression models.
    Salmerón D; Cano JA; Chirlaque MD
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2755-67. PubMed ID: 25944082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.
    Jiang Z; Carter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):651-662. PubMed ID: 29949073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian optimization of perfusion and transit time estimation in PASL-MRI.
    Santos N; Sanches J; Figueiredo P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4284-7. PubMed ID: 21095751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference.
    Briskot T; Stückler F; Wittkopp F; Williams C; Yang J; Konrad S; Doninger K; Griesbach J; Bennecke M; Hepbildikler S; Hubbuch J
    J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():101-110. PubMed ID: 30579636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.