132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36529690)
1. Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification-A method comparison study.
Graf R; Zeldovich M; Friedrich S
Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200098. PubMed ID: 36529690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of the generalised predictive ability of eight machine learning algorithms across ten clinical metabolomics data sets for binary classification.
Mendez KM; Reinke SN; Broadhurst DI
Metabolomics; 2019 Nov; 15(12):150. PubMed ID: 31728648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.
Imura T; Toda H; Iwamoto Y; Inagawa T; Imada N; Tanaka R; Inoue Y; Araki H; Araki O
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Oct; 30(10):106011. PubMed ID: 34325274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of machine learning methods for classification using simulation with multiple real data examples from mental health studies.
Khondoker M; Dobson R; Skirrow C; Simmons A; Stahl D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1804-1823. PubMed ID: 24047600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of supervised machine learning algorithms for classification and prediction of type-2 diabetes disease status in Afar regional state, Northeastern Ethiopia 2021.
Ebrahim OA; Derbew G
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7779. PubMed ID: 37179444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the supervised learning algorithms in sex estimation of the proximal femur: A comparative study in contemporary Egyptian and Turkish samples.
H Attia M; H Attia M; Tarek Farghaly Y; Ahmed El-Sayed Abulnoor B; Curate F
Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):288-309. PubMed ID: 35598923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discriminative clustering via extreme learning machine.
Huang G; Liu T; Yang Y; Lin Z; Song S; Wu C
Neural Netw; 2015 Oct; 70():1-8. PubMed ID: 26143036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning-based monosaccharide profiling for tissue-specific classification of Wolfiporia extensa samples.
Hsiung SY; Deng SX; Li J; Huang SY; Liaw CK; Huang SY; Wang CC; Hsieh YSY
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Dec; 322():121338. PubMed ID: 37839831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Ozcan I; Aydin H; Cetinkaya A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Oct; 23(10):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 36308351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning algorithms for predicting malnutrition among under-five children in Bangladesh.
Talukder A; Ahammed B
Nutrition; 2020 Oct; 78():110861. PubMed ID: 32592978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminant independent component analysis.
Dhir CS; Lee SY
IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2011 Jun; 22(6):845-57. PubMed ID: 21521666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model.
Judson R; Elloumi F; Setzer RW; Li Z; Shah I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():241. PubMed ID: 18489778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nitrate Classification Based on Optical Absorbance Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms for a Hydroponics System.
Sulaiman R; Azeman NH; Abu Bakar MH; Ahmad Nazri NA; Masran AS; Ashrif A Bakar A
Appl Spectrosc; 2023 Feb; 77(2):210-219. PubMed ID: 36348500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of supervised machine learning algorithms in the classification of sagittal gait patterns of cerebral palsy children with spastic diplegia.
Zhang Y; Ma Y
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Mar; 106():33-39. PubMed ID: 30665140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use of machine learning algorithms in forensic anthropology.
Nikita E; Nikitas P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101771. PubMed ID: 32795933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decoding semantic relatedness and prediction from EEG: A classification method comparison.
Trammel T; Khodayari N; Luck SJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120268. PubMed ID: 37422278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of subject-independent and subject-specific EEG-based BCI using LDA and SVM classifiers.
Dos Santos EM; San-Martin R; Fraga FJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Mar; 61(3):835-845. PubMed ID: 36626112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A robust spike sorting method based on the joint optimization of linear discrimination analysis and density peaks.
Zhang Y; Han J; Liu T; Yang Z; Chen W; Zhang S
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15504. PubMed ID: 36109581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Appropriate Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Mesothelioma Detection and Cure.
Saxena K; Zamani AS; Bhavani R; Sagar KVD; Bangare PM; Ashwini S; Rahin SA
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2318101. PubMed ID: 35845952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
