These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36530124)

  • 1. Driver Expectations of a Partial Driving Automation System in Relation to Branding and Training.
    Singer J; Tefft BC; Benson A; Jenness JW; Horrey WJ
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1531-1544. PubMed ID: 36530124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour.
    Merriman SE; Revell KMA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104057. PubMed ID: 37285640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a 3M (mistakes, mentoring, and mastery) training program for transfer of control situations in a level 2 automated driving system.
    Roberts SC; Hanson W; Ebadi Y; Talreja N; Knodler MA; Fisher DL
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Apr; 116():104215. PubMed ID: 38176134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's in a name? Drivers' perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems.
    Teoh ER
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():145-151. PubMed ID: 32199557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot: Neural Indices of Driver Workload and Engagement During Partial Vehicle Automation.
    McDonnell AS; Simmons TG; Erickson GG; Lohani M; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1435-1450. PubMed ID: 34414813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drivers' Performance in Non-critical Take-Overs From an Automated Driving System-An On-Road Study.
    Rydström A; Mullaart MS; Novakazi F; Johansson M; Eriksson A
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1841-1857. PubMed ID: 35212565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.