These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36530786)

  • 1. Retracted: Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single Center Experience in China.
    Healthcare Engineering JO
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9862727. PubMed ID: 36530786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Yin H; Zeng F; Xue M; Tian X
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Jun; 45(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 32879129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.
    Callewaert G; Bosteels J; Housmans S; Verguts J; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Van der Aa F; De Ridder D; Vergote I; Deprest J
    Gynecol Surg; 2016; 13():115-123. PubMed ID: 27226787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.
    Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips.
    Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
    Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.
    Moore R; Moriarty C; Chinthakanan O; Miklos J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):887-892. PubMed ID: 27766346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors of lower urinary tract injury with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Welch EK; Dengler KL; Guirguis M; Strauchon C; Olsen C; Von Pechmann W
    AJOG Glob Rep; 2022 Feb; 2(1):100035. PubMed ID: 36274961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single Center Experience in China.
    Niu K; Zhai Q; Fan W; Li L; Yang W; Ye M; Meng Y
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():6201098. PubMed ID: 35070239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse.
    Blaganje M; Lutfallah F; Deval B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1117-9. PubMed ID: 26886552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.