BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36533110)

  • 1. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Rodríguez Sánchez J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Pellisé M; Coto-Ugarte D; Uchima H; Aranda-Hernández J; Santiago García J; Marín-Gabriel JC; Riu Pons F; Nogales O; Carreño Macian R; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Hernández L; Patrón GO; Rodriguez-Tellez M; Redondo-Cerezo E; Sánchez Alonso M; Daca M; Valdivielso-Cortazar E; Álvarez Delgado A; Enguita M; Montori S; Albéniz E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):941-951.e2. PubMed ID: 36572129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
    Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK; Cho YS; Lee SH; Lee BI
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions.
    Oh CK; Lee BI; Lee SH; Kim SJ; Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Park JM; Cho YS; Lee IS; Choi MG
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 33913030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of Under-Gel Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Partial Submucosal Injection and Under-Gel Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Difficult Colorectal Polyp Cases.
    Yamamoto K; Ikeya T; Shiratori Y
    Dig Dis; 2023; 41(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 35358975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hot snare polypectomy
    Minakata N; Murano T; Wakabayashi M; Sasabe M; Watanabe T; Mitsui T; Yamashita H; Inaba A; Sunakawa H; Nakajo K; Kadota T; Shinmura K; Ikematsu H; Yano T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 29(23):3668-3677. PubMed ID: 37398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.
    Sato Y; Ozawa SI; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Yamashita M; Matsuo Y; Yamamoto H; Itoh F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1820-1826. PubMed ID: 32356110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic mucosal resection using cold snare versus hot snare in treatment for 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: protocol of a non-inferiority randomised controlled study.
    Jiang Q; Yan X; Wang D; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Feng Y; Yang A; Wu D
    BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e070321. PubMed ID: 37217262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.
    Papastergiou V; Paraskeva KD; Fragaki M; Dimas I; Vardas E; Theodoropoulou A; Mathou N; Giannakopoulos A; Karmiris K; Mpitouli A; Apessou D; Giannikaki L; Karagiannis JA; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
    Endoscopy; 2018 Apr; 50(4):403-411. PubMed ID: 28898922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.