These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36533267)

  • 21. Regulatory options for genetically modified crops in India.
    Choudhary B; Gheysen G; Buysse J; van der Meer P; Burssens S
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2014 Feb; 12(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 24460889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.
    Lacey LA; Grzywacz D; Shapiro-Ilan DI; Frutos R; Brownbridge M; Goettel MS
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2015 Nov; 132():1-41. PubMed ID: 26225455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A dubious success: the NGO campaign against GMOs.
    Paarlberg R
    GM Crops Food; 2014 Jul; 5(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25437241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests.
    Betz FS; Hammond BG; Fuchs RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):156-73. PubMed ID: 11067772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trends in pesticide use on soybean, corn and cotton since the introduction of major genetically modified crops in the United States.
    Coupe RH; Capel PD
    Pest Manag Sci; 2016 May; 72(5):1013-22. PubMed ID: 26194175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Insect-Resistant Genetically Engineered Crops in China: Development, Application, and Prospects for Use.
    Li Y; Hallerman EM; Wu K; Peng Y
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2020 Jan; 65():273-292. PubMed ID: 31594412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Opportunities for Orphan Crops: Expected Economic Benefits From Biotechnology.
    Zambrano P; Wood-Sichra U; Ruhinduka RD; Phillip D; Nin Pratt A; Komen J; Kikulwe EM; Falck Zepeda J; Dzanku FM; Chambers JA
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():825930. PubMed ID: 35873974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatiotemporal patterns of non-genetically modified crops in the era of expansion of genetically modified food.
    Sun J; Wu W; Tang H; Liu J
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14180. PubMed ID: 26380899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    Nakai S; Hoshikawa K; Shimono A; Ohsawa R
    Transgenic Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 26138875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
    Lema MA
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. PubMed ID: 31321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetically Modified Food Labeling in China: In Pursuit of a Rational Path.
    Zhu X; Roberts MT; Wu K
    Food Drug Law J; 2016 Aug; 71(1):30-58. PubMed ID: 29693931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coexistence of genetically modified seed production and organic farming in Chile.
    Sánchez MA; Campos H
    GM Crops Food; 2021 Jan; 12(1):509-519. PubMed ID: 34979872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of agricultural biotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess the safety of genetically modified crops in Iran.
    Mousavi A; Malboobi MA; Esmailzadeh NS
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1513-6. PubMed ID: 17956001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Managers' attitudes toward gene-editing technology and companies' R&D investment in gene-editing: the case of Chinese seed companies.
    Kang Y; Deng H; Pray C; Hu R
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):309-326. PubMed ID: 36382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consideration of familiarity accumulated in the confined field trials for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified soybean (Glycine max) in Japan.
    Matsushita A; Goto H; Takahashi Y; Tsuda M; Ohsawa R
    Transgenic Res; 2020 Apr; 29(2):229-242. PubMed ID: 31997144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toward a workable biosafety system for regulating genetically modified organisms in Ethiopia: balancing conservation and competitiveness.
    Abraham A
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23580251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Progress and Challenges for Implementation of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Policy on Biotechnology and Biosafety.
    Waithaka M; Belay G; Kyotalimye M; Karembu M
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():109. PubMed ID: 26284243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.