265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36533610)
1. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Raschpichler M; de Waha S; Holzhey D; Schwarzer G; Flint N; Kaewkes D; Bräuchle PT; Dvir D; Makkar R; Ailawadi G; Abdel-Wahab M; Thiele H; Borger MA
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(24):e7965. PubMed ID: 36533610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Data.
Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Serna-Gallegos D; Makani A; Kliner D; Toma C; West D; Ahmad D; Yousef S; Brown JA; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Chu D; Sultan I
Am J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 212():30-39. PubMed ID: 38070591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.
Al-Abcha A; Saleh Y; Boumegouas M; Prasad R; Herzallah K; Baloch ZQ; Abdelkarim O; Rayamajhi S; Abela GS
Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():74-81. PubMed ID: 33529615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement or re-surgical aortic valve replacement in degenerated bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and midterm results.
Bruno F; Elia E; D'Ascenzo F; Marengo G; Deharo P; Kaneko T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L; De Filippo O; Gallone G; Andreis A; Fortuni F; Salizzoni S; La Torre M; Rinaldi M; De Ferrari GM; Conrotto F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jul; 100(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 35485723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve.
Ismayl M; Abbasi MA; Mostafa MR; Aboeata A; Vora AN; Ben-Dor I; Anavekar NS; Goldsweig AM
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 189():98-107. PubMed ID: 36521415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gozdek M; Raffa GM; Suwalski P; Kolodziejczak M; Anisimowicz L; Kubica J; Navarese EP; Kowalewski M;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 53(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 29029105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of Concomitant Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: Insights From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry.
Sathananthan J; Murdoch DJ; Lindman BR; Zajarias A; Jaber WA; Cremer P; Wood D; Moss R; Cheung A; Ye J; Hahn RT; Crowley A; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Webb JG
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 29929637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
