These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3653423)

  • 1. How low is too low? Postwash total motile sperm count effect on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Mathes M; Kastrick E; Sayles H; Gustin S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 36357350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Analysis of pre and post-Processing Semen Parameters at The Time of Intrauterine Insemination; and The Confounding Effects of Total Motile Sperm Counts on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Dahan MH; Tan SL; Nair S; Feinberg Isaacs T
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2023 Nov; 18(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 38041455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of intrauterine insemination time on semen parameters.
    Koyun E; Okyay RE; Doğan OE; Kovalı M; Doğan SS; Gülekli B
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2014; 15(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 24976772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?
    Yavuzcan A; Yurtçu E; Keyif B; Osmanlıoğlu Ş
    J Pers Med; 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poor air quality from wildfire smoke is associated with decrease in total motile sperm count at time of intrauterine insemination.
    Rubin ES; Kornfield M; Parker P; Garg B; O'Leary T; Baldwin M; Krieg S
    Fertil Steril; 2024 May; 121(5):881-883. PubMed ID: 38346549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do pregnancy rates differ with intra-uterine insemination when different combinations of semen analysis parameters are abnormal?
    Kuriya A; Agbo C; Dahan MH
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2018 Jun; 19(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 29553043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two sperm processing techniques for low complexity assisted fertilization: sperm washing followed by swim-up and discontinuous density gradient centrifugation.
    Fácio CL; Previato LF; Machado-Paula LA; Matheus PC; Araújo E
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2016 Dec; 20(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 28050954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of sperm motility after processing and incubation to predict pregnancy after intrauterine insemination in normospermic individuals.
    de Araújo LF; de Araújo Filho E; Fácio CL; Bossoni MC; Machado-Paula LA; Corrente JE; Cavagna M; Matheus PC; Pontes A
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2013 Oct; 11():101. PubMed ID: 24148998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sperm chromatin integrity on fertilization rate and embryo quality following intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Sadeghi MR; Hodjat M; Lakpour N; Arefi S; Amirjannati N; Modarresi T; Jadda HH; Akhondi MM
    Avicenna J Med Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 1(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 23408716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination.
    Pasqualotto EB; Daitch JA; Hendin BN; Falcone T; Thomas AJ; Nelson DR; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Oct; 16(9):476-82. PubMed ID: 10530401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting sperm yield during swim-up.
    Purvis K; Egdetveit I
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Feb; 10(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 8339019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous swim-up/swim-down of sperm in assisted reproduction procedures.
    Almagor M; Benbenishti D; Rosenak D; Mogle Y; Yaffe H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 May; 10(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 8130430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of within-patient semen variability to outcome of intrauterine insemination.
    McGovern P; Quagliarello J; Arny M
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Jun; 51(6):1019-23. PubMed ID: 2721719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sperm swim-up: a simple and effective technique of semen processing for intrauterine insemination.
    Jameel T
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 58(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 18333524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.
    Ombelet W; Dhont N; Thijssen A; Bosmans E; Kruger T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 24456701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semen quality before and after processing by a swim-up method: relationship to outcome of intrauterine insemination.
    Arny M; Quagliarello J
    Fertil Steril; 1987 Oct; 48(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 3653423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.